User talk:Jayden54/Archive1

Dead Rising
Many video games have weapons articles. Surely Dead rising, with over 250 weapons, deserves a weapons article? The article is only three weeks old or so... Racooon 09:02, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Yo Dawg
Ai G, hooz U gonna tak bout no'ing dat Bontrager iz uh Trek-owned company been all controvercial dawg? datz whack lik iz cancer section been only 3 word stings long dawg, how U gonna do a homie lik dat? "ooohh welllll, heee haaddd soomeee cancer but then heee won some race" FOOO, dis the lance armstrongs page nut da lance armstrongs winnin' dat race page. lance wud tell ya da most important shizzle nizzle hi hus liff was da beatin' of a cancer not da race, aight. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 160.39.153.161 (talk) 00:03, 25 November 2006


 * I don't fully understand your comment (sorry), but I reverted your edits because they seemed a bit controversial. If you feel like it should be in there, please add it back, and I won't remove them again. However, another editor might though. If that happens, you might want to talk about it on the Talk page of the article. Thanks, and welcome to Wikipedia! Jayden54 23:08, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Reverting the Ric Ocasek article
Ric Ocasek, The Cars, Benjamin Orr, Greg Hawkes, Elliot Easton were updated (albums) by Tamara4006, why did you revert it back? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.215.26.175 (talk) 22:51, 25 November 2006


 * I didn't revert the edits by Tamara4006, but I reverted the edits by 71.219.105.98 (as can be seen in the diff). Tamara4006 reverted her own edits (by removing the album) so you should ask her. I hope this clears everything up. Jayden54 21:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Kirkley
I have cleaned up the Kirkley article and removed your speedy tag; and I want to explain why. In general, geographic locations merit articles on WP. When, as here, they are full of rubbish, the normal practice is not to speedy them but to clean them up and stub them. I will understand if you do not agree. If so, then the way to go is to submit an AfD. If you do submit one I shall abstain due to my involvement hitherto. Please let me know if I can help, further. TerriersFan 00:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)


 * It looks pretty good now, and it has some references to ascertain its notability, so I have no problems anymore with this article. It's just that when I saw it it was a complete mess and didn't seem notable at all. Since that's no longer the case I won't bring it to an AfD. Thanks for letting me know about this! Jayden54 10:07, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Re:User talk:198.30.10.254
Hello Jayden54 I would like to inform you that 190.30.10.254 is a school IP address and that some of the people's edits may be inappriate, but some people at this school may need to make edits one day. 198.30.10.254 14:43, 29 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for letting me know, and I will keep that in mind. I will see if I can add some sort of notice to the User talk page so others know this as well. Jayden54 15:58, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

You're quoted in the Washington Post
This article. Near the bottom of the first page. Vizjim 15:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Wow, that's pretty cool. Thanks for letting me know, because I had no idea. Jayden54 16:54, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

marking CLOUDS - influential 60's Rock Group' for deletion
I don't accept your definition of Clouds not being 'notable'. If you read the sources I left at the foot of the page, you'd find all the sources and verification you need. A cursory glance at Amazon. com, both in the Uk and the Usa, will show you who Clouds were. If you checked the Clouds website (www.cloudsmusic.com) as I originally suggested, you'd find yet more articles and references, including the 4 page MOJO Magazine article about Clouds/1-2-3 which credited them with 'The Birth of Prog', and in which, David Bowie describles Billy Ritchie as 'an unrecognised genius'. 'The History of Scottish Rock & Pop' is a BBC book (Guinness Publishing) - there seems ample source confirmation of everything said in the article. Unless the criteria is something completely different than I understand it to be, I don't see how the band can be dismissed as 'not notable'. Please advise...thank you User:Matthew.Hartington11:25, 7 December 2006


 * I've changed my vote to weak keep, as you're right about the band being more notable. Jayden54 12:58, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Pmanderson's RfA
I would ask that you revisit Pmanderson's RfA page to see the comments about his recent un-adminlike behavior. I don't believe he is ready for adminship. Skyemoor 03:56, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I had a look at your comment, and some of the other comments by opposing voters but I'm not really convinced he's not ready. He's had a few civility problems, and 3RR violations, but it looks like he has cleaned up his act, so I'm sticking to my vote. Thanks for contacting me though. Jayden54 15:45, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Two cows AfD
I found and added 5 print sources which presented and discussed the joke. Edison 19:06, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know, and I've changed my vote because of this. Jayden54 15:44, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Celtic warriors
This creator of this AfD discussion page had accidentally linked it to the Welsh rugby team of the same name. I have fixed the link and was wondering if you wanted to revise your comment. -- I sl a y So lo mo n  |  t a l k  17:19, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Ah, that makes sense, thanks for letting me know! Jayden54 17:28, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Approved for AWB!
Thank you for your recent application to use AutoWikiBrowser. I have approved your request and you should now be able to use the AWB application. Be sure to check every edit before you save it, and don't forget to check out the AWB Guide. You can get any help you need over on the AWB talk page. Feel free to contact me with any questions, Alphachimp 03:04, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Jayden54 09:09, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Re: Young Hot Rod's deletion (So you say two albums should be required for an artist to have his own page?)
I think you should check WP:MUSIC again. It is only one of the criteria, and that page says any of the criteria would be sufficient. Tom Danson 22:02, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I replied on the AFD page. Cheers, Jayden54 09:15, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

9/11: The Big Lie
I have now totally revamped/stubified this article in order to deal with the POV issues. Please take a look at the new version if you like. Thanks, Bwithh 08:01, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know and it's great that you've cleaned up the article as that will hopefully mean it'll be kept. I already voted keep so I don't need to change my vote, although I might change it to strong keep. Jayden54 12:00, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

AfD Bot
Oh, please -- go ahead! I don't even have enough time to keep up with my normal activities, let alone learn enough C/Python/whatever to automate it. I've developed a semi-automated way of doing it (in my monobook.js file), but I'd be extremely grateful if you'd take this up. If you end up developing it, too, I'd also be eager to help in any way that I can! :) Daveydw ee b ( chat/review! ) 04:49, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marija Pavlović
I would ask that you return to the article Marija Pavlović, and then do a simple google on the name without diacritics "Marija Pavolivic" there are over 15,000 ghits in English alone, and even more than that it you use her married name and look in other languages. So, I think we have reached much more than the required WP:BIO for this article. I did, by the way, add to it a bit, fixed the links, and will work on the redlinks therein in the next couple of days. SkierRMH 06:38, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Nerd Boy afd
Your "vote" makes no sense to me. I challenge you to find more notable ascii art webcomic, or provide a more elaborate description why this article should be deleted.  Grue  07:53, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Rafed.net
Following a deletion review Rafed.net has been relisted: Articles for deletion/Rafed.net (2nd nomination). - brenneman  01:57, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Isabella Soprano
I've restored the infobox, but without any information which didn't have a clear source. As to the filmography... eh. It looked like a straight copy from IMDB, and to my mind if we're never going to link out to the films there isn't much point in having a simple list; the information is more useful in context in the extlink. YMMV. Shimgray | talk | 17:15, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Andrew eiden.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Andrew eiden.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU ≈ talk 01:47, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Bot error
Hi Jayden54, I left a little report here on an error your bot made. Hope it's easily fixable. Cheers. Robotman1974 22:17, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 22nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:30, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Victoria lynn Weston Bio
Hello Jayden54 - Please do not delete this article page. My editor is currently updating and making editing revisions more appropriate with Wiki's guidelines. Thank you. Vweston3554 14:43, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I've replied on your talk page: User_talk:Vweston3554. Jayden54 15:04, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

JuJube
Thank you for your quick response to my "article deletion" concern. As you suggested, I clicked on the link that brought me to the page with the few users agreeing to my article deletion. What concerns me is that JuJube (who appears to be quite active here) does not post a valid reason for deletion but merely makes a derogatory remark about the photo used. Specifically, "don't look at the picture, you'll go blind." This is clearly an unprofessional remark. In addition, it's clear that he is not well researched about the subjects as he's trying to remove other additions that I have made.

As a newbie, I look forward to learning more about the policies and guidelines and as I stated previously will have my own bio re-edited to the standards here.

I noticed recently, a colleague and friend parapsychologist Jeffrey Mishlove's biography has been removed. This man has made significant contributions to the world of psi and truly belongs on the pages of Wikipedia. If it's possible, please remove his deletion status, I highly recommend his intensive writings, experience and knowledge would enhance the psi pages.

Finally, I can search dozens of bios that are written in resume style, advertising and promotional style including dozens of outside "self promoting" links and have wondered why they are not deleted.

Thank you, Vweston3554 19:01, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi Vweston, I've replied on your talk page. Cheers, Jayden54 22:36, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 29th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 17:42, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Billy Campbell AfD
Please review my comments regarding the proposed deletion of Billy Campbell. I have referenced over 20 non-trivial, reliable published works, whose sources are independent of the subject itself.

Given that numerous independent authors, scholars, or journalists have decided to give attention to both the emerging trend of Natural Burial in North America as well as Mr. Campbell’s role as a pioneer in the natural burial movement I would suggest that the primary notability criterion to determine whether "the world" has judged this individual and topic to be notable has been met.

I would appreciate your supportEulogy4Afriend 18:21, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

re bot edit conflict
I'm glad the bug report was helpful. =) Thanks for your work in keeping that helpful bot well-greased. — coe l acan t a lk  — 10:40, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 5th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:12, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Shut down the Bot
I suggest that you immediatly shut down Jayden54Bot, it is making unnecessary deletions!!!Mezlo 13:35, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

sorry
I did not know this, OK.Mezlo 01:08, 9 February 2007 (UTC)