User talk:Jayden960

A page you started (John Alexander (doctor)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating John Alexander (doctor), Jayden960!

Wikipedia editor Scope creep just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"He does exist in a number of books. Please add reference."

To reply, leave a comment on Scope creep's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

scope_creep (talk) 22:10, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jock O' The Burn


The article Jock O' The Burn has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Skamecrazy123 (talk) 18:49, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jock O' The Burn


A tag has been placed on Jock O' The Burn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. TheSandDoctor (talk) 18:50, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I have just added references and a couple of bits of info to the page.

A page you started (Canisbay Parish Church) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Canisbay Parish Church, Jayden960!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Looks good. I've done general cleanup: it's listed Cat A, so I've cited that, tagged the talk page, added a picture and linked to the Wikimedia Commons category and added a picture. Hope that's OK."

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Blythwood (talk) 22:40, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wick Baptist Church


The article Wick Baptist Church has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No properly formatted independent references. No indication of notability. Does not indicate where the church is or why the church (congregation or building) is notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:21, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Alexander (doctor)


The article John Alexander (doctor) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not notable, no sources"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Natureium (talk) 19:12, 30 April 2019 (UTC)