User talk:Jayen466/Archives/2011/October

The Signpost: 3 October 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 05:19, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

S.U.F.I.
Hi J,

A friend just found this link: Society for Understanding of Fundamental Ideas (a la Shah's original "twee" acronym). http://www.societyforunderstanding.co.uk/

Thought you might be interested. WHOIS says Registrant is an Oliver Schindler, London.

Cheers, eric.  Esowteric + Talk  09:08, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Eric. :) -- J N  466  22:30, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
 * If it's another hoax, don't mention my name.
 * Some discussion at: W.O.R.K. group @ Facebook
 *  Esowteric + Talk  09:08, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
 * -- J N  466  19:32, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Kelly Wearstler
Hi Jayen466! I have seen that you have contributed to the article about designer Kelly Wearstler. I wanted to let you know that I have started a conversation about the use of the 2008 Domino magazine cover in the article. It was removed under non-free content criteria reason #8 (that it has no contextual significance) and perhaps you'd like to comment on the talk page. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 13:59, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
 * It seems to me there is some contextual significance, but these questions can be really tricky. I've dropped User:Moonriddengirl a note; she knows her way around copyright and its implications better than most around here. Best, -- J N  466  19:31, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 October 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:37, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 October 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 10:28, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

AFD of article you contributed to
Please see: Articles for deletion/List of new religious movements BigJim707 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 11:29, 18 October 2011 (UTC).

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks, Crackofdawn! All the best, -- J N  466  15:39, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar and kind words. Cla68 (talk) 17:15, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

well said
I liked the way you framed things on the controversial images issue at ArbCom. When the request is denied (as seems likely) I will be thinking about creating a policy RfC - that seems to be the tenor of many of the committee responses - and I could use help drafting it. if you're interested, let me know. -- Ludwigs 2 20:38, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't think your (Jayen466's) idea of requiring that images come from reputable sources will work: its consequence would be that Wikipedia contains hardly any images.  Images in reputable published sources are almost always copyrighted in a way that does not permit us to use them. Looie496 (talk) 15:54, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Of course we cannot use the exact same images as our sources, and I would not advocate that. But our general approach and style of illustration should be fully in line with that used in reputable sources. -- J N  466  15:58, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 October 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 10:43, 26 October 2011 (UTC)