User talk:Jayhoffer

August 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page The Jewish Internet Defense Force has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bblogspot\.com' (link(s): http://dconservative.blogspot.com/2008/08/is-this-end-of-jidf.html). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 06:23, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Kubigula (talk) 15:19, 8 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you for clarifying. Based on that, I agree that your edit does not violate the prohibition against publishing original research.  However, the remaining problem is that blogs are not considered reliable sources.  It is problematic for Wikipedia (and unencyclopedic) to host such negative information about people or organizations without strong sources to back it up.  I trust you understand the concern.-- Kubigula (talk) 03:51, 11 August 2008 (UTC)