User talk:Jayhryan

Sisters of the road
Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article (actual title as above) because
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. You gave no references at all.
 * I am unconvinced that a single cafe is likely to meet those notability criteria, the fact of existence is not enough. If it doesn't meet our criteria, it's a waste of time writing about it, "big in Portland" isn't enough
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: change that will end poverty and homelessness forever... safe, dignified space... A belief in food justice and universal human rights... Non-profits and charities often seem to think that they are exempt from our advertising rules; that is not the case. we'd like to get the word out online'' suggests that you still don't appreciate that.
 * I do still want to create a page for my 510(c)3 organization... We're a nonprofit organization&mdash; You have an obvious conflict of interest when editing this article. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.
 * You make it clear that the blocked account User:SistersOfTheRoad is also you. Unusually for me, in a moment of weakness when I blocked, I allowed you to create a new account, despite noting that you removed a speedy deletion tag yourself, which is not permitted. *Your message also implies that you wish to own the content of the page. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia which anyone can edit.

I don't think there is any point restoring the article as it stands, one paragraph of largely promotional and unsourced text, but there is nothing yet to stop you trying again. Before doing so, you need to be sure that you can find independent third-party references as defined above to show notability, otherwise it will be deleted again.

You need to get it right if you do recreate. Your conflict of interest will make it difficult for you to write a neutral factual article and further deletions may follow. Look at other Wikipedia article so you have some idea how to write an article, and start your article as a draft rather than post straight to article space. Let me know if you have any questions, Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:59, 27 March 2016 (UTC)