User talk:Jaylenogoesham

October 2012
Hello, I'm Tbhotch. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Max Weber, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions.  20:06, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Max Weber. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Max Weber was changed by Jaylenogoesham (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.943007 on 2012-10-07T20:06:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:06, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Electricidad, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Electricidad was changed by Jaylenogoesham (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952215 on 2012-10-07T20:08:51+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:08, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Political editorializing rule


A tag has been placed on Political editorializing rule requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:37, 23 November 2012 (UTC)