User talk:Jaynelovesthecircus

Advertising, sockpuppetry
This is your last warning. The next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. OhNo itsJamie Talk 04:13, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Blocked

 * You are confused. I did not block you, I just warned you; when we block an editor for spamming and a new editor appears soon after and begins making similar edits it's pretty obvious something fishy is afoot. If you'd like to make other edits to Wikipedia besides promoting a non-notable firebreathing person, please state what they are. Otherwise, give it up. OhNo itsJamie Talk 01:40, 18 August 2012 (UTC)


 * You can reply without leaving a template. Add four tildes ( ~ ) at the end. I've requested a technical investigation that will make it clear if you are the same person (i.e., using the same computer) as GWRTEAM, who was making very similar edits to yours. In the meantime, please read about edit warring and the 5 pillars of Wikipedia. tedder (talk) 04:26, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi tedder, thanks for your note. I am using a public computer attached to my college but I imagine that your technical investigation will show that it's a different computer unless the gods are truly against me and GWRTEAM is someone else who has access to this computer which has odds of about 1m-1. In the meantime, I'm still not really sure what I did wrong...if I ofen another account when I go home how can I avoid the same blocks? I did everything in good faith, I never saw any GWRTEAM edits Jaynelovesthecircus (talk) 05:01, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
 * If you want to avoid being reblocked, I suggest that you (1) stop removing sourced content from Chris Cross and (2) stop adding information about non-notable fireeaters (Preacher whatever), which were nearly the exact same edits that GWRTEAM was blocked for making. If you are unblocked and resume with those same edits, I will quickly reblock you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:39, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Ohnoitsjamie: All the the content I removed from chris cross was unsourced, it either had dead links, no references or in one case and entire section was actually tagged as completely unsourced. I would never remove anything that had a source to back it up, I did the same thing on the sideshow page. As for the fire breathing edit, I have *no* idea what GWRTEAM added I just put what I though was relevant and included a reference to back up what I had added. If it is those pages that are a particular issue I can leave them alone and let someone else make the needed corrections and focus on other pages. I really don't know what the issue is, If you have an issue with GWRTEAM please sort it out between you and them and please leave me out of it. All I did was remove stuff that was unsourced and added stuff that was, I thought, relevant and provided a reference for it. I cannot answer to what GWRTEAM said as the information is now removed but it has nothing to do with me.
 * Nothing you added about the preacher guy is reliably sourced. If other accounts start mysteriously springing up and re-adding the content, I'd be happy to blacklist the link to his page, FYI. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 00:58, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

ohnoitsjamie: If the sources I linked to verify the information about Preacher was insufficent then ok, but I think a ban was overkill. Like I said I am a novice at this, it was not done out of malice or anything like that. As for other accounts springing up, I have told you already this is my first an only wiki account and so far I have found wiki an incredibly unfriendly place. Please contact GWRTEAM directly and talk to them because they have ntohing to do with me and taking out your issues with them on me is pointless. I can't comment on edits other than my own and cannot account for the actions of others. If this account is going to stay blocked for theforseeable future please let me know and I'll delete the account and leave wiki, no point in being here if I can't correct mistakes etc.Jaynelovesthecircus (talk) 22:52, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Based on the checkuser findings (which strongly suggest sockpuppetry) this account is blocked indefinitely. OhNo itsJamie Talk 13:29, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

ohnoitsjamie: I don't know what checkuser or sockpuppetry mean. Can you, or someone else, please simple state if I am going to be blocked for the foreseeable future due to the miss-association with another account or if I am going to be unblocked soon. To state again, I am a novice, first-time wiki user, I don't know who GWRTEAM is, I do not understand the terms you are using. I do know the difference between indefinate and infinate however if this is a month long ban or something like that I am happy to just leave wiki to itself.
 * Yes, you are banned. See indefinitely, WP:CHECKUSER and WP:SOCKPUPPETRY. OhNo itsJamie Talk 00:16, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Ohnoitsjamie: Thank you for clearing that up, can you please confirm how long the ban will be and if this is due, specifically, to the mistaken belief I have some connection with GWRTEAM?
 * I already sent you a wiktionary link for the word "indefinitely." I'm not responding further to this. OhNo itsJamie Talk 00:39, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Ohnoitsjamie: Thanks for replying, I did read the link. I will copy this whole page to my college advising future wiki users that the pages on chris cross and fire eating/breathing are banned for editing are the moderators have specific interests on these pages and should not be corrected and that any editing from this college may be subject to banning, leaving myself accountable for this. I will not be revisiting this page/site as I apparently unwittingly got into a personal war between ohnoitsjamie, chris cross, GWRTEAM and preacher thus have been banned for interests beyond my reach. Whatever the issues between you four are I hope you resolve them before you blame anyone else who is actually trying to participate in what I once believed was an open information source. Tedder: Don't worry about the trace, I am sure it will show GWRTEAM and myself are different individualist but ohnoitsjamie has made it clear s/he is less than objective so any future edits I would make would be removed no matter what, espc as s/he critisied edits I made to him/her/they putting up unsourced material. I'll just delete the account and leave it up to you and ohnoitsjamie to make all the edits Jaynelovesthecircus (talk) 01:04, 21 August 2012 (UTC)