User talk:Jayscott253

I've been joined by a bot...
And I'm joyful \v/ Jayscott253 (talk) 17:55, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Only one account
It appears that you recently started editing without registering, as IP address 97.98.105.252. Then created account User:Jayscott478. And today created account User:Jayscott253. Using more than one account is called creating sock puppets, and will lead to you being permanently blocked. Going forward, please use only one account. David notMD (talk) 14:52, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
 * And if you also created User:Jayscott192, you may not use that account again, either. Should you use User:Jayscott192 or User:Jayscott478 or any other account other than this one, you are liable to be investigated for Sock puppetry, and all linked accounts could be permanently blocked from editing. Nick Moyes (talk) 22:12, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

What Loop articles look like
If you can add to your four drafts so they approximate Texas State Highway Loop 20 then you have a chance they will be accepted as articles. If not, not. David notMD (talk) 01:56, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Loop 20
It looks like the loop at Laredo Texas and crosses into Mexico. Jayscott253 (talk) 03:59, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * My point is length and referencing of Loop articles is much, much more than you have created so far in four drafts. Texas State Highway Loop 49 is another example. David notMD (talk) 10:47, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Please stop
Please stop adding a single sentence to the beginning of the lead of Loop articles describing the length of the road(s) in question. Length is stated in the Infobox and does not need to be repeated. David notMD (talk) 10:57, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Texas State Highway Loop 149, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''Please follow the format used in the article Texas State Highway Loop 20. Your single-sentence articles are incomplete and I've moved them to drafts.'' Daiyusha (talk) 07:44, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Stop creating unsourced, non notable articles
Use the WP:AFC process to create drafts that can be worked on over time to establish notability and references. Continuing to create poor quality very short articles can be seen as disruptive editing. Melcous (talk) 14:03, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Texas State Highway Loop 142


The article Texas State Highway Loop 142 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Page previously moved to draft as not ready for main space, recreated by editor with no improvements"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Melcous (talk) 14:06, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Texas State Highway Loop 149


The article Texas State Highway Loop 149 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Page previously moved to draft as not ready for main space, recreated by editor with no improvements"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Melcous (talk) 14:06, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wesley E. Seale Dam


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Wesley E. Seale Dam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Daiyusha (talk) 16:52, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Daiyusha (talk) 16:58, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Texas State Highway Loop 564


A tag has been placed on Texas State Highway Loop 564 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"A7"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CoconutOctopus  talk  17:06, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wesley E. Seale Dam


The article Wesley E. Seale Dam has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unsourced creation of single sentence articles. Article creator as been creating several of these; therefore, it would be best to PROD them. If article creator adds cites of some substantial worth, then the article can stay."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –eggofreason(talk &middot; contribs) 17:10, 8 March 2019 (UTC)