User talk:Jaytribute516

Nomination of Jay Jason for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jay Jason is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jay Jason until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. MikeWazowski (talk) 20:36, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

thank you and I am now tryhing to follow these directions and they are now posted on the discussion pages regarding the article.--Jaytribute516 19:33, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Leonard Jason

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Jay Jason, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Concord, Stevensville and Raleigh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Jay Jason
The edits look alright, although I recommend that you use the standard citation templates - the "cite" button above the edit box will give you instructions.

I've also changed your user-page from a redirect to a link, because we don't normally redirect user-pages to articles. Deryck C. 15:29, 14 February 2012 (UTC)


 * The citations are not "broken". However, it'd be good to format them by filling in the relevant fields of the Cite button above, instead of listing the references and URLs in plain text. Deryck C. 22:40, 24 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Looks good! Deryck C. 21:54, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

I think what the article needs is for someone else to brush the article over. I'm very busy recently, and I recommend that you go find help at WP:EA. Deryck C. 16:14, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)