User talk:Jayverma2210

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Pankaj Joshi (physicist), may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:
 * Copying text from other sources
 * Policy on copyright
 * Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
 * Policy and guideline on non-free content

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.


 * Introduction
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 23:11, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lunar Gravitational Wave Detection (November 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TechnoSquirrel69 were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lunar Gravitational Wave Detection and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Lunar_Gravitational_Wave_Detection Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TechnoSquirrel69&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Lunar_Gravitational_Wave_Detection reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 07:45, 21 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I have read through the Lunar GW article, I like it. Excellent technical content. But, as you can see, Wikipedia has certain strict style guidelines. What you wrote would be ideal for a magazine like Physics Today or similar; but for WP, the style is wrong. I like the article, you really should fix it up and get it out of the draft stage. The links above will explain how to get help with the needed changes. Anyway, I also left a few questions on the article talk page. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 05:30, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Naked singularity
Hi!

Thank you for your edits to naked singularity! They are fine, with some minor quibbles, which I'd like to explain. Before I start, I'd like to mention that I'm the person who made a complete hash of things, and then, realizing my mistake, tried to restore things back into what I thought was a workable order. My apologies for that, it was a late-night whoopsie. I was tired, and I erred.

Here's the problem: Wikipedia articles are meant to have a lede written in a certain, particular style. See Manual of Style/Lead section for the gory details. While reading this article (late at night) I noticed that the lede was not in the conventional format. Further down, I read something else that did not seem quite right (it was late at night) and I got suspicious: this had all the hallmarks of a crank editor inserting what is widely feared: "original research". Looking at the edit history, I saw your changes, and decided to revert all of them, fearing that they were all cranky.

Minutes later, I realized I'd made a mistake. I re-read what you'd written, and it all seemed to be just fine, so I undid all of my deletions. There remained the problem of the lede, which did not follow the manual of style. So I resurrected the old lede, and merged your alterations so that they'd still follow the formal style. I believe that what I left behind was the best of both worlds: technically correct, and in the proper style.

Today, I notice that you've undone this, breaking the style once again. I'll revert. Please read and double-check, but stick to the proper style. I think that the result is technically correct, but its possible I'd made a mistake (why, it's late at night, even right now!). Again sorry for the inconvenience, thank you for the contributions, and ummm, welcome to Wikipedia, even if it feels like a rough start. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 05:03, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Lunar Gravitational Wave Detection


Hello, Jayverma2210. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Lunar Gravitational Wave Detection".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit  14:01, 21 May 2024 (UTC)