User talk:Jazzgod69

Your submission at Articles for creation: Synaptrix Labs (August 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Loksmythe were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Synaptrix Labs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Synaptrix_Labs Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Loksmythe&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Synaptrix_Labs reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Loksmythe (talk) 23:53, 26 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello, I have fixed all citations, and added many more 3rd party citations to support written information. I rewrote sections to adhere to neutrality principles, and remove any possible self-promotional material that interferes with Wikipedias principles. I sincerely apologize for the above issues, as this is my first time writing an article for Wikipedia. I have corrected these issues, and look forward to the article being added to Wikipedia! Draft:Synaptrix Labs Jazzgod69 (talk) 04:59, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Synaptrix Labs


A tag has been placed on Synaptrix Labs, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:47, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
Hello Jazzgod69. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Synaptrix Labs, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jazzgod69. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:47, 11 September 2023 (UTC)


 * I am not being directly or indirectly compensated for any edits. However, I have a personal relation to the subject of the article. Is there a way to disclose personal relation, with no compensation? Jazzgod69 (talk) 16:51, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Synaptrix Labs (September 11)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.


 * Draft:Synaptrix Labs may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Jazzgod69 Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Jazzgod69 reviewer's talk page] . or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:57, 11 September 2023 (UTC)


 * There is no copyrighted material anywhere on the Synaptrix Labs page. This is a mistake Jazzgod69 (talk) 16:59, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
 * No, that is a mistake. Everything is in copyright, unless the right has expired or been expressly released. Copying from any source without attribution is in any case note allowed. See WP:CV. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:10, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
 * There is nothing copied from any source. Please clarify Jazzgod69 (talk) 17:32, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Here is your clarification. (And BTW, LinkedIn has a © claim on it.) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:36, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
 * That job post does not exist anymore? Jazzgod69 (talk) 17:56, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Jazzgod69. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the edit COI template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see );
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see );
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:00, 11 September 2023 (UTC)