User talk:Jazzybee53

Proposed deletion of Janus Cercone


The article Janus Cercone has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Promotional article, written like an advertisement for the subject. No evidence of passing WP:CREATIVE or WP:GNG, and no evidence of sufficient biographical reference material for a WP:BLP. The article was put up with approximately this content in 2016 by an SPA. Of the six references, two are dead and only two even mention the subject of the article. WP:BEFORE shows zero coverage of the subject's supposedly notable stage and film career, and a tiny amount of coverage of properties she and her husband try to sell. For this BLP to remain, we need solid, in-depth sources that show clear notability, and sufficient biographical coverage to base an article on."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 20:15, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Janus Cercone for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Janus Cercone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Janus Cercone until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. David Gerard (talk) 14:48, 12 February 2021 (UTC)