User talk:Jb211506

The SPLC writes hit pieces on anyone who is not politically on the left. You should know that already. Disagreeing with someone's political views is not carte blanche to declare smear opinions "facts". Those claims are not a credible source of information, should not be referred to as if they are established fact, but claims only, and refutation for them or at least unbiased language should be utilized.

Also, once a person has changed his name legally, that is the legal name by which they are to be referred in any article purporting to be authoritative.

I'll leave the page alone for now, but I want an objective discussion on this and I want it with Wiki editors / officials / whatever who are non-biased and can objectively discuss the issue. Jb211506 (talk) 00:40, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

This is not censorship. It is removal of false information that constitutes libel and for which no source beyond the opinion of a few smear articles exists. Jb211506 (talk) 00:31, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * As long as you take your ideas/objections/proposed edits on the article talkpage, and discuss them with editors there, before you add anything to the article, you should be fine. Once other editors agree with your points, then you can add information to the article. Reverting other editors, without discussion, is a bad thing, but I see that you are on your way to fixing that problem. Dr.   K.  00:52, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Please stop. Wikipedia is not censored. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article, such as you did to Augustus Sol Invictus, will be regarded as vandalism. If you continue in this manner, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Grayfell (talk) 00:29, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Augustus Sol Invictus, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Dr.  K.  00:30, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Augustus Sol Invictus shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dr.  K.  00:31, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert
-- Dr.  K.  00:34, 12 August 2018 (UTC)