User talk:Jb2673

What is authoritative about watchin.today?
Hi. Would you be able to demonstrate how watchin.today fits within WP:Reliable sources. Thanks. I have removed those additions at this time as I cannot see that they do fit our criteria. — billinghurst  sDrewth  10:40, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Please do not remove this discussion. This is a conversation that should not be hidden. Legitimate question from an admin relating to what looks like link spam added by you, and again added by you following my query. If I see the link added again without some sort of validation, then I will take the next level defensive measures. — billinghurst  sDrewth  03:03, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I added citation to articles to provide more information about the channels which I think fits purpose of Wikipedia. As far as I know, the website WatchinToday is a website which gathers public information on YouTube and analyze the information with many third parties to make source more reliable. I am not 100% sure whether if fits within WP:Reliable sources, but I can hardly tell the difference withe other sources in those articles which provide YouTube channel statistics and ranking. If you(admin) think what I did is spamming, I will stop adding citation to articles. But I must say if WatchinToday is not authoritative, all other websites which provides YouTube rankings are not also authoritative. Thank you. — Jb2673 23:22, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, I noticed it here. It does run the risk of appearing as spammy. We care what mainstream sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy have to say, not random websites, blogs, content scrapers, etc. Just because a website exists doesn't mean that it is reliable in any way. Even with content scrapers, we don't know what content they haven't scraped, so these sorts of faceless rankings are just not trustworthy. Hope that helps. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:04, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bangtantv (April 28)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JalenFolf was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bangtantv and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bangtantv, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Bangtantv Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JalenFolf&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Bangtantv reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jalen D. Folf  (talk)  05:28, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Bangtantv concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bangtantv, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:43, 19 October 2019 (UTC)