User talk:Jbarmstrongiii

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Shreevatsa (talk) 01:30, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Zenzizenzizenzic has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 01:42, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Please read Verifiability. Shreevatsa (talk) 02:25, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Your 'alternative definition' of zenzizenzizenzic is not verifiable, i.e. it cannot be checked for accuracy. Also, it is not notable, as neither the objects nor their inventor are important. Please refrain from edit warring over this, or you risk getting banned from Wikipedia. Thanks. Fences and windows (talk) 02:50, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Re your recent edits to Zenzizenzizenzic, please read our policy on verifiability, which states that all material added to Wikipedia must be capable of support from reliable sources. Spacepotato (talk) 02:47, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Zenzizenzizenzic
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Zenzizenzizenzic. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Zenzizenzizenzic (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:14, 19 March 2010 (UTC)