User talk:Jbarrettasst

April 2013
Hello, I'm 99.0.83.243. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! 99.0.83.243 (talk) 01:13, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Better still, please use the article talk page to explain why you wish to remove sourced content. Thank you, 99.0.83.243 (talk) 01:14, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. 99.0.83.243 (talk) 02:02, 12 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Again, I strongly suggest you use the article talk page to explain why sourced material must be deleted. Otherwise your edits can be construed as WP:COI, perhaps with the intent to rewrite a subject's past. If the sourced content is indeed untrue, another venue is the WP:BLP noticeboard, which is where I'll take this if need be. But I assure you that merely deleting content that in no way defames the subject and calling it false won't work. 99.0.83.243 (talk) 02:02, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
 * To that end, I've begun a thread here . You're welcome to comment there. Thank you, 99.0.83.243 (talk) 02:09, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
 * It appears that the cited source is not reliable, and another editor has considered it proper policy to honor your claims and remove the objectionable content. Given their rationale I can't say I disagree. Thank you, 99.0.83.243 (talk) 03:51, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Katheryn Winnick‎, you may be blocked from editing. ''Please stop reverting the edits to Katheryn Winnick‎'s page. Reliable source states facts, if you want to take it off, find another reliable source stating otherwise Lady Lotus (talk) 13:41, 12 April 2013 (UTC)'' Lady Lotus (talk) 13:41, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 01:25, 24 August 2013 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 01:26, 24 August 2013 (UTC)