User talk:Jbernfeld

Welcome
Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, see: If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Falcon8765 (talk) 03:58, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Manual of Style

Rangers
Regarding your email, it's fine - just dropped a welcome template on your talk page so you have links to help you as you edit. :) Falcon8765 (talk) 07:34, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Ol English - Question
Hi. Are you able to see this question for you? I appreciate your feedback about http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jbernfeld/Sandbox It was helpful! I'm going to read that article you suggest. I learned about the site I'm trying to write about because my girlfriend bought something from it and can't stop talking about it with all of her friends. Then, I did some research and it looked like there were numerous TV stories in major markets across the country as well as some prominent magazine articles. While not revolutionary, it seemed pretty notable. Though I realize there needs to be a high bar or else every single website would want to be on Wikipedia. How does one try to prove "notability"? Well, I will rewrite some things as well as try to add some notes about its importance. Thanks again! Jeff Jbernfeld (talk) 20:49, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jasmere.com
A tag has been placed on Jasmere.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Toddst1 (talk) 13:06, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Jasmere.com
I have commented at the deletion review for Jasmere.com. I have also undeleted the article. I am still not convinced the article should stay, but I accept that it is not a clear-cut case, and so I have restored it for now. I am not ruling out the possibility of another deletion via a new AfD, but I have decided there are enough doubts about a speedy deletion to lead me to give the article another chance. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:10, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Jasmere.com
I have nominated Jasmere.com, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Jasmere.com&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Toddst1 (talk) 16:25, 19 August 2010 (UTC)