User talk:Jbfair728

Speedy deletion of We Love Bush
A tag has been placed on We Love Bush requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ~ mazca  talk 22:56, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Vamoose Bus Logo.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Vamoose Bus Logo.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 13:12, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of David Kernell
I have nominated David Kernell, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/David Kernell. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. –MuZemike 07:05, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Censorship of TCL involvement in BlackBerry DTEK50
It's a key point. Why did you attempt to withhold it? ViperSnake151  Talk  20:17, 27 July 2016 (UTC)


 * I didn't censor it, I just moved it to the beginning of the next section. The phone is sold and marketed to the public as a BlackBerry device. Does the Priv or the iPhone state "developed by Foxconn" in the leading section?Jbfair728 (talk) 21:50, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * This is a different situation. Foxconn does not put out its own product under a different name, which Apple resells and brands as an iPhone. All iPhone products are contracted to Foxconn for manufacture. This is more like the Toyota Matrix/Pontiac Vibe idea: two separate companies releasing essentially the same product but under their own brands and marketing. ViperSnake151   Talk  00:19, 28 July 2016 (UTC)