User talk:Jbiggs19

Abaca
I have had a quick look at the article and made a few minor copy-edits. Everything else looks relatively OK (well sourced, etc.), although I am not an expert on company articles and you would probably get a more informative response asking at the Companies WikiProject. One thing that I would question is the inclusion of the various products at the end, as they add little to the reader's understanding and may be seen as simply promoting (see point 5) the company. If you have any more queries, please feel free to ask me!  RichardΩ612  Ɣ ɸ 17:29, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for Image:Abaca tech.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Abaca tech.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 01:15, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Abaca tech.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Abaca tech.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:32, 6 September 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 23:32, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: your adoption request
I'm sorry, but currently I am a bit too busy to effectively adopt and mentor you. Please feel free to ask another user. Regarding your article, I can give you some links that could assist you, one of the big ones would be Writing your first article, guide to notability and our article on conflicts of interest. I'm sure your article will make an excellent contribution to Wikipedia (provided it meets relevant guidelines). Happy editing! — ^.^ &#91;citation needed&#93; 23:51, 9 September 2008 (UTC)