User talk:Jbntj

Not a crystal ball
The consensus is that there is no need for a future energy development article.

Your revert is vandalism disruptive editing.

By the way, not that it matters, but did you use a different username before? It seems highly specious that a new user would have the finesse with Wikipedia that you have been demonstrating in your few edits. 199.125.109.105 19:30, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Template:WikiProject Energy
Your reversion of Template:WikiProject Energy constitutes vandalism disruptive editing. I am reverting to your highly offensive image temporarily in order to avoid an edit war. 199.125.109.127 02:08, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Please discuss here your reason for insisting that a nuclear power image be on the project template. It sounds horribly POV to me. I do not like oil, but hey it is the most used energy source at the present time. In twenty years, who knows, if it changes, change the image then, but not now. 199.125.109.84 00:07, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Oh and adding to a talk page? What? A lot of things on the talk pages are a POV and everything should be regarded as possibly controversial. 199.125.109.84 00:48, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Reversion/Archiving
Sorry I reverted your archiving - didn't realize that's what was going on. cheers Geologyguy 20:22, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Wind power
Hello, I was wondering why you changed the assessment for environment. Assessments are not subjective, they have to be compared to the guidelines laid down by the assessment teams. You cannot change the class simply because you feel that article deserves whichever rating. For this reason, I'm going to put the article back to B-class. OhanaUnited   Talk page   07:23, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Once again, you can't change Wind Power to GA class. Any class above B-class (that is... GA, A, and FA) requires a review by editors before they can be assigned with that class.  OhanaUnited    Talk page   08:38, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Immoral Sexuality
Template:Immoral Sexuality has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Eyrian 13:24, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

A note on cleanup tags
Hi. I just wanted to make a quick note: when adding cleanup tags to articles, please consider using one or more of the more specialised templates listed at Template messages/Cleanup. Thanks, Black Falcon (Talk) 01:18, 5 August 2007 (UTC)