User talk:Jbrandon2012

Wi-Fi
Can you locate sources outside of YouTube? It's not clear that the news program authorized that content to be republished via YouTube, and as a potential copyright violation, we can't link to it as a source (although, the program and episode number could be cited and linked to the program's home website). Also, the addition needs to be re-written to be much more concise so as to not put undue weight on that element. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 01:36, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Wi-fi
Please read WP:UNDUE and WP:OR. The section you are adding is way too large given that Wifi health effects are not considered serious by the mainstream medical community. I suggest proposing the section on the talk page first. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:36, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Please stop adding WP:UNDUE sections with sources that don't meet WP:Reliable sources guidelines. There is more than enough in the article about the dispute health effects as it is. Also see WP:FRINGE. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:28, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Wi-fi
Again your changes need to go to the talk page. If you re-add them again, without consensus on the talk page, I will request that an admin have a look. Ravendrop 10:28, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Wi-fi
It is important for the small percentage of the population who are having health issues related to Wifi to have a common source which LISTS possible issues/causes, so readers can identify with and confirm or deny such, as a possible cause and effect.

You are denying readers this information and opportunity.

The basic decription needs to be in written words. Personally, I have worked in the tech industry(Apple, Inc, Microsoft, and others) periodically for ten years and two year ago, I began experiencing on again and off again, many of these health issues; and have personally tested validity of such on many occasions over months durations (it took me a year before realizing issues were a direct relation to Wifi). I honestly would have never believed "in a million years" such a relationship existed if it was not for my personal experience and personal "testing" and reconfirmation over and over again. I'm super smart and highly rational/logical and certainly kept issues in perspective. Additionally, here are other medical research sources that confirm the same potential health descriptions:

http://www.starweave.com/freiburger/ Letter from National German MD Assoc - 6,000 members "signed letter" in support dealing with exposure to pulsed high -frequency microwave radiation(aka Wifi) with Headaches, migraines, etc, specifying "We can no longer believe this to be purely coincidence"

http://www.magdahavas.com/2010/09/24/white-spaces-super-wifi-and-potentially-dangerous/ http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/green-living/germany-warns-citizens-to-avoid-using-wifi-401845.html http://www.emrpolicy.org/news/headlines/press_release_azen.pdf

It's late - I can provide more sources if needed. PLEASE UNDO- thank you.

The key point is that for the small percentage of people who may or may not be aware of such a relation, Wiki many be the first source one turns to, and a basic overview of the common "decribed" health issues is key. Jbrandon2012 03:55, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

One more final warning
If you continue to add material that is not reliably sourced, you will be blocked. There will not be another warning. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:08, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Regarding OhNoitsJamie:

As one single individual, what give you the "ultimate right" to dictate and supress information that clearly may help people, Why is this such a profound issue to you? To supress knowledge.... maybe you should move to China or Iran.

Here is one article that elaborates on health issues and advisories - ultimately a warning by the government of Germany, regarding Wifi and health concerns.

http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/green-living/germany-warns-citizens-to-avoid-using-wifi-401845.html

Germany warns citizens to avoid using Wi-Fi

Environment Ministry's verdict on the health risks from wireless technology puts the British government to shame.

By Geoffrey Lean

People should avoid using Wi-Fi wherever possible because of the risks it may pose to health, the German government has said.

Its surprise ruling – the most damning made by any government on the fast-growing technology – will shake the industry and British ministers, and vindicates the questions that The Independent on Sunday has been raising over the past four months.

And Germany's official radiation protection body also advises its citizens to use landlines instead of mobile phones, and warns of "electrosmog" from a wide range of other everyday products, from baby monitors to electric blankets.

The German government's ruling – which contrasts sharply with the unquestioning promotion of the technology by British officials – was made in response to a series of questions by Green members of the Bundestag, Germany's parliament.

The Environment Ministry recommended that people should keep their exposure to radiation from Wi-Fi "as low as possible" by choosing "conventional wired connections". It added that it is "actively informing people about possibilities for reducing personal exposure".

Its actions will provide vital support for Sir William Stewart, Britain's official health protection watchdog, who has produced two reports calling for caution in using mobile phones and who has also called for a review of the use of Wi-Fi in schools. His warnings have so far been ignored by ministers and even played down by the Health Protection Agency, which he chairs.

By contrast the agency's German equivalent – the Federal Office for Radiation Protection – is leading the calls for caution.

Florian Emrich, for the office, says Wi-Fi should be avoided "because people receive exposures from many sources and because it is a new technology and all the research into its health effects has not yet been carried out".

Jbrandon2012 15:25, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Blocked for repeatedly adding WP:FRINGE material, non-reliable sources and original research
You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:53, 13 February 2011 (UTC)