User talk:Jbraunstein12

Speedy deletion nomination of Smartbatch


A tag has been placed on Smartbatch, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. MrOllie (talk) 18:35, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

WHO ARE you and why are you singling out my content vs other content that is similar? Why have you not put the same scrutiny on other articles such as JAMS scheduler and VisualCron? Jbraunstein12 (talk) 20:49, 9 May 2017 (UTC)jbraunstein12

Speedy deletion nomination of SQLAutomate


A tag has been placed on SQLAutomate, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. MrOllie (talk) 18:35, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

WHO ARE you and why are you singling out my content vs other content that is similar? Why have you not put the same scrutiny on other articles such as JAMS scheduler and VisualCron? Jbraunstein12 (talk) 20:49, 9 May 2017 (UTC)jbraunstein12

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Jbraunstein12. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 18:37, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:59, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

User talk page
Please refrain from posting article content on your user talk page. The purpose of a user talk page is for notification and discussion with other users. If you want to develop articles, you may use either your user sandbox (User:Jbraunstein12/sandbox, which I see you have already used) or the draft article space. Thanks. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:04, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Edits and Delisting
With all due respect -- I am posting what I believe is constructive comments. I expect that my content is the treated the same as others. What I'm experiencing is that my content is not treated the same as others. I took at look at other content that is related and found that it is posted by people that claim to be editors but looks very suspicious (outside the US with no technical background in the content they have posted). I can't seem to get my content posted so I will need to do what it seems others have done and go outside the US to get someone who is apparently an "editor" to post? It does not seem that this is the way it is suppose to work. Please advise (constructively) where I can research the correct way to post content (articles, etc) on Wikipedia? What specifically am I missing about my identity? What is promotional about my content vs. the content that I referenced (JAMS Scheduler and VisualCron)? I'm assuming Wikipedia is suppose to be unbiased and the same rules apply to all?


 * First of all, anyone can edit Wikipedia, regardless of skill level and/or geographic location. Of course, we expect editors to have a basic level of competence and the intent to edit constructively. Beyond that, Wikipedia has no formal structure with which to determine whether an editor is a subject-matter expert, and does not grant users privileges based on expertise.
 * Topics also have to be notable - as Wikipedia defines notability - to be accepted as articles. For software, there are particular recommendations at Notability (software). The general rule is that the article subject has to have already received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Simply existing is not enough. As for the other articles you referred to... each article has to merit inclusion on its own. Comparing your articles to others isn't going to make a convincing argument. I looked at both JAMS Scheduler and VisualCron... although they could both use some improvement, they both include references to third-party sources, which satisfies that they are sufficiently notable for inclusion.
 * It's also been suggested that you have a personal or professional connection to these topics. Please note that this is considered a conflict of interest (COI), and therefore we advise that you not write about these topics. Having a COI does not prohibit you from writing about the topics, but it's reasonable to assume that it will impair your ability to write with the required neutral point of view. If you still feel compelled to try, we recommend that you use the Articles for Creation process. This will allow you to write a draft article which can then be reviewed by other uninvolved editors before being published or sent back to you for further revisions.
 * I'll give you some recommended reading. Best of luck to you.
 * Plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * Notability (general)
 * Notability (software)
 * Your first article
 * --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 22:33, 9 May 2017 (UTC)