User talk:Jc-S0CO/Archives/2008/1

WikiProject Films December 2007 Newsletter
The December 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:48, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Jc-S0CO/Userboxes/Iraq
User:Jc-S0CO/Userboxes/Iraq, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jc-S0CO/Userboxes/Iraq and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Jc-S0CO/Userboxes/Iraq during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.  Web H amster  00:56, 16 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The US and the UK are the 2 largest foreign troop contingencies yes. You could equally have chosen an image from each force, but given all the patriotic userboxes on your userpage it's pretty clear what your intent was. -- Web H amster  02:46, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, the US and UK are the two largest entities. But being as I was not readily able to find a UK-related Iraq War image, I chose instead to represent the ground and air fronts instead of individual nations (again, the US and UK were not the only militaries involved.) If you can find some UK images, I would be happy to consider them. But this alone is not a basis for deletion. ~ S0CO ( talk 02:54, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Archive links to CommonDreams
Hi, I am wondering why you have decided (twice now) to delete a reference which is archived at CommonDreams.org, despite having the original reference at the Associated Press also intact. Is there something in Wikipedia policy that mandates that any article archived by a partisan site is unsuitable for inclusion in an article? Silly rabbit (talk) 16:34, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * As a matter of fact, there is. But the bigger question is why an archive link is even needed when the original is still available on AP's website. ~ S0CO ( talk 16:38, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Regarding the WP:CITE link, I see. Thanks for the info.   In the future, you may want to consider fixing the issue with the reference rather than outright deletion.  Silly rabbit (talk) 16:41, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem. ~ S0CO ( talk 16:42, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

IP
I would recommend that you sign up for an account. It's free, anonymous (no IP-Location backtracker on your talk page), and you are not restricted from editing semi-protected articles. ~ S0CO ( talk 19:00, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but no thanks. I have no interest in registering an account. 199.125.109.77 (talk) 19:05, 30 January 2008 (UTC)