User talk:Jc-S0CO/Archives/2008/12

WikiProject Films November 2008 Newsletter
The November 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. My apologies for the late delivery, and thanks go to both Wildroot and Erik for writing the newsletter. Remember that anyone can edit the newsletter, so feel free to help out! Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 08:32, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)
The November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 16:42, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Knights Templar
I was just curious what part of my adding in the charges was tendentious? I don't see how that's biased if that is what the Templars were charged for. Here's the link for the changes http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Knights_Templar&diff=256916689&oldid=255580532. Also seeing as how these are the main charges (with reputable scholars as citations), not sure how it's unhelpful.Sdsguy (talk) 00:30, 10 December 2008 (UTC)sdsguy
 * I didn't revert your changes - in point of fact, the changes I made regarding the Shroud of Turin were reverted, too. I don't see what was tendentious about my edit either - I was simply noting that the carbon dating test which the sentence said proved the shroud's age had since been challenged. »S0CO ( talk 05:11, 10 December 2008 (UTC)