User talk:Jc iindyysgvxc/Archive

Fair use rationale for Image:Christmort.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Christmort.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 23:06, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

March 2007
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. MER-C 10:15, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Computer games are not video games) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. - Hdt83  |  Talk  03:09, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

March 2007
Hi there. I noticed your contributions to a closed AFD on Multimedia Applications Development Environment, which are rather puzzling. Can you further explain why it is so important to you that this article be deleted?--Xnuala (talk) 00:06, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

For the last time, it is beacause the article was not edited in 2006! Jc iindyysgvxc 22:39, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Template:Toosmallplot) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Robotman1974 09:26, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Unblocking
I've replied on my Talk page. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 08:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

I've responded there again. If you haven't got my Talk page watchlisted, I'd suggest you add it to your watchlist during this discussion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 10:00, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Assuming that you're the IP who contributed to the discussion, it's still going on there. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Adminship
I just noticed that you'd attempted to create what we call an "RfA" (Request for Adminship) for yourself. That's probably not a great idea this early in your "career" here, since admins are expected to have a thorough knowledge of policies and procedures and your comparative lack of experience suggests that you probably don't have that. I'd be happy to help you learn these policies and procedures, though. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 09:56, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Wrong Spelling
I should point out that you misspelled the seiyuu who voiced the Young Link. The correct spelling is Fujiko Takimoto. Be advised. &mdash; Vesther (U * T/R * CTD) 01:09, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Strongbad Email) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. 72.75.73.158 06:19, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism here
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 05:17, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism to a template
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 05:27, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Nonsense of Michigan Calvin
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Michigan Calvin, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Michigan Calvin provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Michigan Calvin, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Michigan Calvin itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 15:16, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 09:04, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our Biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Flyguy649talkcontribs 04:03, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of pages
Just a reminder that any page created in the article space (so, a page which doesn't say "User" or "User talk" in front of it) needs to be judged by the merits of the subject matter. If someone deletes it, it's deleted because it doesn't pass notability criteria, is an attack page, is spam or something along those lines. If that happens to a page you created, remember to remain civil. You've been given enough warnings about your conduct over the last few months now. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 05:13, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. - Rklawton 02:20, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Civility
Don't abuse other editors when making edits. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 06:04, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

June 2007
This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as I hate yone minagawa, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kesac 12:28, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
You've been warned on multiple occasions about vandalism and related abuses of editing privileges. It doesn't seem to work, so I've blocked you for a while. My advice is that you might want to take this enforced break to read up on the way that Wikipedia normally works - have a look, for example, at what is meant by the term vandalism. You've got it in you to become a valuable contributor, but you need to change the behaviours you're currently exhibiting. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 07:13, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

List of human spaceflights
Thank you for your contribution, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the Sandbox to get started. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 12:56, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism to Robert Farquharson
What's with this edit? -- Longhair\talk 07:13, 15 September 2007 (UTC) Blocked You have been blocked for vandalism for 24 hours. To contest this block, add the text  on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time. MBisanzBot (talk) 14:47, 7 May 2008 (UTC) -- Longhair\talk 07:18, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Candidates for Jorge Taveras Award‎
What will this category be used for? BigHaz - Schreit mich an 08:25, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cave christmas.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Cave christmas.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. βcommand 22:16, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:SSX Tricky.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:SSX Tricky.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 06:44, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

October 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 22:53, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

This ends now
We've dealt with your request to unblock that IP. We've dealt with it several times over the course of the year, in fact. If you don't have anything more to add to it (and you don't, going by the fact that you just copy-pasted the discussion in again), then don't say anything more. I'm going to revert a simple pasting of the discussion and call it vandalism, because that's really all it is. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:22, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

November 2007
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:22, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 06:04, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

For the record
The address is an IP. You can want it, not want it or want it to turn cartwheels for you for all that matters. Your feelings on the matter are entirely irrelevant when considering whether the address will be blocked or unblocked. I think this is now the 7th or 8th time we've gone through this. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 06:07, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Again, you have an answer. That answer is that your feelings on whether an IP should or should not be blocked are irrelevant. I don't know how many more times you want me to say it. If you keep adding that obnoxiously long discussion to my Talk page, it will continue being removed and you will continue to be deemed a vandal. Several months ago, I remember suggesting that you read up on how to contribute to Wikipedia more gainfully, and I'm going to repeat that suggestion now. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 11:56, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Morgan Black
A tag has been placed on Morgan Black requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nen yedi  • (Deeds•Talk) 01:11, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 10:56, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
I've tried to help you, that didn't work. I've warned you that if you continued to vandalise people's Talk pages (changing templates) and articles (removing Speedy Deletion templates) and so forth that you would be blocked, that didn't seem to stop you either. You're now blocked, as I'd indicated you would be. As I suggested last time, have a bit of a look around this website and see how everyone else contributes. That way, next year when the block expires you'll probably have some good role models to follow.

While I think of it, there've been two edits of yours I've undone which weren't vandalism. Just to clarify:
 * If someone is found guilty of the crime of murder in a court of law, they're a murderer. The only time under which that designation ceases to be the case is if they lodge an appeal and are successful in the appeal. Robert Farquharson is planning to appeal, however he has not even lodged the relevant documents at present. The idea of intent is established as part of the prosecution of the case.
 * Putting a lower (or upper) case letter in square brackets (such as "[m]ining") is a very common convention. It means that the original text had a letter in the other case, but that you aren't using that punctuation in your text. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 11:13, 17 November 2007 (UTC)