User talk:Jcami

Jesus Christ Apostolic Ministries
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Owen&times; &#9742;  23:43, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Please go a head and delete the Article, there is no reason it should be up for deletion. i would rather not be a part of this Encyclopedia. I will delete my membership all so.

Thanks

Oh! yes i remember i would not think of doing that, We are a "Oneness Organization" and i would think we would have the same respect as the Articles on the (PAW) and the (UPCI) and others, we are the same Faith. Just want to know why the JCAMI is not welcome when i was a member of the PAW. I know it does me no good to go against the higher power, that is one reason we started our own Encyclopedia. I just thought i would try Wikipedia again. i just do not know why you would except one Organization and not another when they are the same thing and all most worded the same?? makes one wonder does it not?


 * It's not a question of "respect", it's about notability and verifiability of the claims made on the page. If you are creating a wikipedia page as a way to get respect or some other such goal, then that's not good, but if you simply want to improve the encyclopedia, that's a good thing.  It is important, however, to remember that we're writing an encyclopedia.  Correct grammar and spelling, adherence to wikipedia policies, and patience, are crucial.  Focus on making the article good, and pay close attention to the objections in the speedy-deletion.  Take a look at those two articles you identify: they are good articles, well researched with lots of useful references and so forth.  The article you've created isn't up to those standards, and I would invite you to improve it.  But the most important things will be those addressed in the speedy-deletion notice. Work on that first. Tb (talk) 06:47, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Clearly Understood that is why it is a work in progress, i was not looking for respect, just a listing with the same Organization for those looking for "All" the "Oneness" Religions. Not just a chosen few (The Bigger ones) or the ones that have been around for while. No one Organization should be more important than another. Some of the member of the JCAMI has been a member of both the PAW and the UPCI and understand we are all "One Religion" We will be working on it to put "Internal Link" to point where we wink up with all the other "Religions'". To make Wikipedia better with more info on all the "Oneness" People all over the world. Any one in the "Oneness Religion" would agree that we are in many Organization (And all important) we all are the same. I just ask to let us get all the info tied in with the other Organizations..


 * It's not about importance or fairness; it's about the quality of the article, and Wikipedia's unbending standards of verifiability and notability. Tb (talk) 02:19, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

I will not Debate, we will not do that so this will be my last reply to "Talk". Wikipedia has some issues we see in the news about notability. We see a lot of articles you have that should be up for deleting but are not, it seems every time we at the JCAMI put an article up, it is up for deleting. You "Admin" have the power just do not use it for your own personal ideas. Check out the "External links" (I see you have already deleted it) you do not waste any time. We are doing our own Encyclopedia our "Admin" will give people a chance as long as they are "Main Stream" and a "Legal" organization so everyone will know how this organization come together. Take care and God Bless.


 * I'm not an admin; I did not make the decision in question. Tb (talk) 21:22, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jesus Christ Apostolic Ministries International
A tag has been placed on Jesus Christ Apostolic Ministries International requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Basket of Puppies 05:44, 16 September 2009 (UTC)