User talk:Jcating12

check this link for the guy who keeps rehashing your contributions

http://www.bcsfootball.org/bcsfb/timeline

i'm not sure how to use citations, links, etc.

peace

GROW UP! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.44.102.252 (talk) 07:02, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

NCAA Division I-A national football championship
You've removed USC from the 2003 national championship listing on more than one occasion. Each time it has been reverted. I'm treating any subsequent removals as vandalism. Dlong 19:29, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dlong 15:40, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Hershiser Divorce
This is getting absurd, to the point of vandalism on your part (not for the first time, it appears from reading here). What is your agenda? It's well known that the Hershiser's are divroced, and I sourced it as well. Your continued edits are vandalism, as well as immature. --Bigbadkeeper 14:08, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

I have researched this fact and have found no information whatsoever on Orel & Jamie Hershiser being divorced. The only information I can find on it is in fact on the Wikipedia page. I have no agenda other than to have accurate information on the page. Where did you get your info? Jcating12

You'll need to go beyond a Google search. Contact Dodgers or Rangers staffers, or beat writers for both teams (as I've done). Lexis-Nexis perhaps?

You have two responses to this. To continue to insist that I'm simply making this up (and I'd do that because...?) or accept the fact that this information is accurate (and sourced as much as possible) and stop childishly vandalising the page (which has gotten many people banned from Wiki). --Bigbadkeeper 16:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

The only thing childish is your crappy attitude to anyone that dare challenges you on this. No one has claimed you haven't done homework, but have you ever considered that, God forbid, it might actually be wrong! Since you are so in the loop and sure of yourself why not contact his CURRENT employer: ESPN, to get confirmation. I don't think asking you to cite your research is a reason to get your knickers in such a twist. Jcating12

Sorry my friend, since it's sourced material the onus is on you to prove it is incorrect. That's the way it works around here, hence the reason your continued removal of sourced information is considered vandalism. --Bigbadkeeper 14:04, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Sourced material? Your "link" to your L.A. Times article is dead and you have not proven to anyone where this piece of information comes from. You might call my revisions vandalism but I call yours defamation of character on Mr. Hershiser. I don't care about his "divorce" but I do care about correct information being submitted AND cited. The burden of proof is on you!

November 2008
In a recent edit, you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For subjects exclusively related to Britain (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to other English-speaking countries, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the appropriate variety of English used there. If it is an international topic, use the same form of English the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to the other, even if you don't normally use the version the article is written in. Respect other people's versions of English. They in turn should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any queries about all this, you can ask me on my talk page or you can visit the help desk. Alientraveller (talk) 19:01, 25 November 2008 (UTC)