User talk:Jccmoon

License tagging for Image:CMR SA TSE FS.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:CMR SA TSE FS.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 10:05, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of SCMR
A tag has been placed on SCMR, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion G12.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. B1atv 10:13, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

October 2007
Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. B1atv 10:13, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

SCMR, copyright, neutrality and sources
Hello, in your reasons against deletion of the above article, you said: "I am a board member for this not-for profit medical education society and have permission to copy this mission statement and wikipedia entry. James Moon, SCMR. See board list" I am copying this here, and my response, so that it remains as a guide to you even if the article and talk page are deleted (which I suspect they will be).

If you are a board member you should not be writing articles about it on Wikipedia. This goes against our strict policies that articles should be written without a conflict of interest and from a neutral point of view. As for the copyright issues, without casting any aspersions on what you say, how do we know you are the board member listed? If the organisation wishes to release copyright information into the public domain, it may do so on its own website - then we can see that copyright has been granted. However, you must understand that copyright can't merely be gifted to Wikipedia - material posted here is done so under a GFDL license - that means it becomes available for anybody to use in other places. But, even if you weren't connected to the society; and even if the copyright wasn't an issue, the article still does not meet Wikipedia standards because it doesn't quote any sources to confirm the notability of the society. What is needed is substantial coverage in third party publications such as newspapers, etc. Wikipedia is not a soapboax nor an advertising platform so cut and paste jobs from existing websites will never be suitable for Wikipedia articles. B1atv 10:35, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

My rebuttal Dear Sir,

RE your deletion of the SCMR entry.

Stepwise for ease of rebuttal. 1. SCMR is a moderately sized international society, a learned society, a medical charity with 1300 members subscription members and a stated aim of health promotion. Can I confirm that neither of us us dispute its eligibility to be on Wikipedia as with other list of learned societies? 2. As a board member, I am not renumberated and recieve no expenses and my time is for free running their website. I am an academic. In what way is this a conflict of interest? Wikipedia links do not increase linkage for search engines and even if they did, I would still question whether this represents a conflict of interest. 3. If the small number of experts in a scientific field do not write on a topic, who will? Medicine is quite poorly represented on wikipedia. I am in a position to write a wikipedia entry, I have no financial conflict of interest. It is pleasant that I am able to authorise copyright but who else would be able to? I am also writing about it from a neutral point of view. I have expressed no opinions whatsoever, merely posted stated aims of the society, and stuck to wikipedia guidelines.Your assertion that I am advertising is curious. I am not touting for members, who are all going to be specialists and not using wikipedia information about cardiac heart tests. By your definition, the dissemination of information could thus be concluded to be advertising! 4. If your objection is in the lack of soruces, as you can see, this is only the second posting I have ever made to wikipedia. I can of course list the societies that SCMR is a member of, and its international relationships. Is this acceptable? 5. Finally, if there is a definition or stated goal or aim, how can one post it without copying the facts?

It is easy to destroy; rather harder to build! with very best wishes, Dr James Moon —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jccmoon (talk • contribs) 13:54, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
 * See User talk:Anthony Appleyard. Anthony Appleyard 16:17, 25 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I will try to answer your points in the order you have raised them.


 * 1. If the society is notable then it warrants a Wikipedia article. Your claims about the notability of the society (moderately sized international charity, learned society, 1,300 members, health promotion) count for nothing unless these claims are backed up by reliable independent sources.  This verifiability is a fundamental Wikipedia policy and is non negotiable - your own website can only provide limited verifiability.
 * Wikipedia's rules about notability can be found here and the rules about verifiability can be found here.


 * 2. Conflict of interest has nothing to do with financial reward but to do with your involvement with the organisation. You can question whether a conflict of interest exists.  As far as Wikipedia is concerned, it does.
 * Wikipedia's rules about conflict of interest can be found here and its rules about autobiographies can be found here.


 * 3a. Of course Wikipedia welcomes contributions from medical experts to medical stories - and there are many medical stories you could write about without writing about your own organisation. You say you are not advertising for members; but advertising takes many forms, including promotion of the organisation.  You say you have not expressed a point of view - neutrality is more nuanced than that - for example, you haven't included any criticism of the society either!
 * Wikipedia's rules about neutrality can be found here


 * 3b. The use of Copyright material can't be authorised by you through a statement on Wikipedia; but only on the website on which the original material appeared by including an appropriate notice on that website. Alternatively the website can email Wikipedia to release the material.  There is nothing on that website which indicates that its material is released under a GFDL licence and therefore material from it can't be copied onto here.
 * Wikipedia's process for receiving permission to re-use copyright material can be found here


 * 4. The lack of sources is a real problem. Listing societies of which SCMR is a member is not a source.  A source would be reliable third party publications such as newspapers, magazines, books published by reputable publishers, and so on.  This would need to show not simply that SCMR exists, but that it is notable (see above).
 * Wikipedia's policy on sources can be found here


 * Nobody wants to destroy - but articles must be written in accordance with Wikipedia's policies. An article which is merely cut and pasted from a website - even with permission from the website publishers - is never acceptable.  Writing autobiographies or articles about organisations which you are closely connected, as in this case, is not acceptable and any such article risks speedy deletion or deletion through the afd process.


 * If you can list at least three news sources about your organisation then I will gladly write an article about it. But it will be neutrally written and may not represent the views of the organisation or it's trustees/directors/board.  That's the way Wikipedia works.  B1atv 16:22, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Copyright violation in Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 16:31, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

MedRevise.co.uk
Hey, I thought you might be interested in this, since you are medically active here on wikipedia. With a colleague I have set up a Medical Revision website, called MedRevise.co.uk. It is not trying to compete with Wikipedia, but trying to be something else useful, different and fun. If you are interested, please read our philosophy and just have a little look at our site. I would appreciate your feedback, and some contributions if you have the time. Thanks a lot! MedRevise (talk) 18:33, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:4ch normal flash.gif
A tag has been placed on Image:4ch normal flash.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 14:50, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Secundum ASD cine.GIF
Thanks for uploading File:Secundum ASD cine.GIF. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:06, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:PAPVR.GIF
Thanks for uploading File:PAPVR.GIF. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:06, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:PAPVR.GIF


A tag has been placed on File:PAPVR.GIF requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Armbrust Talk  Contribs  13:57, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Secundum ASD cine.GIF


A tag has been placed on File:Secundum ASD cine.GIF requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Armbrust Talk  Contribs  13:58, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:CMR stress perfusion normal.gif or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:12, 13 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:CMR infarct.gif, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:12, 13 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:CMR infarct cine.gif, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:15, 13 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:CMR SA TSE noFS.gif, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:50, 14 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:CMR stress perfusion inf defect.gif, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:51, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participate
Hi

Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal.

We welcome you to have a look the journal. Feel free to participate.

You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:
 * Publish an article to the journal.
 * Sign up as a peer reviewer of potential upcoming articles. If you do not have expertise in these subjects, you can help in finding peer reviewers for current submissions.
 * Sign up as an editor, and help out in open tasks.
 * Outreach to potential contributors, with can include (but is not limited to) scholars and health professionals. In any mention of Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, there may be a reference to this Contribute-page. Example presentation about the journal.
 * Add a post-publication review of an existing publication. If errors are found, there are guidelines for editing published works.
 * Apply to become the treasurer of the journal
 * Join the editorial board.
 * Share your ideas of what the journal would be like in the future as separate Wikimedia project.
 * Donate to Wikimedia Foundation.
 * Translate journal pages into other languages. Wikiversity currently exists in the following other languages
 * Ceština, Deutsch, Español, Français, Italiano, 한국어, Português, Slovenšcina, Suomi, Svenska, Ελληνικά, Русский, العربية, 日本語
 * Technical work like template designing for the journal.
 * Sign up to get emails related to the journal, which are sent to . If you want to receive these emails too, state your interest at the talk page, or contact the Editor-in-chief at.
 * Spread the word to anyone who could be interested or could benefit from it.

The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.

 D ip ta ns hu Talk 14:07, 11 August 2016 (UTC) -on behalf of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.

Proposed deletion of File:CMR stress perfusion normal.gif


The file File:CMR stress perfusion normal.gif has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:CMR infarct.gif


The file File:CMR infarct.gif has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:
 * File:CMR SA TSE noFS.gif

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:CMR infarct cine.gif


The file File:CMR infarct cine.gif has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 13 August 2019 (UTC)