User talk:Jchkayaker

Speedy deletion of Legitscript
A tag has been placed on Legitscript requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  TN ‑ X - Man  16:22, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Legitscript
Thanks for the e-mail. I prefer to keep Wikipedia related discussions on-Wiki, so please reply on my talk page. Really the only way you can monitor the page is to add it to your watchlist, using the "watch" tab at the top of the page. I reverted User:Gbruen's edits they did not have a reliable source - blogs are not reliable per WP:RS. I will take another look at the article and clean it up a little more, but one issue is sources/references - self-references (like the company's website) are generally not reliable. – ukexpat (talk) 16:20, 4 December 2008 (UTC)