User talk:Jckcip

Speedy deletion nomination of MPHO
A tag has been placed on MPHO requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Triwbe (talk) 13:27, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I see that you used to do a lot of editing on Wikipedia, and no offense is intended, but we try to apply the speedy deletion process fairly and evenly nowadays. If I can't find any hits at all in the Google news archives for the singer (or in this case, since the singer has a name that isn't searchable, her only release, which I understand is anticipated next month), and if you didn't provide any independent, reliable sources that suggest significance, and don't write anything that gives me a clue whether or where I might find such sources, then I have to delete the article.  You're welcome to re-post it when you've got good sources. - Dank (push to talk) 13:54, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

MPHO again
Someone (was it you) created MPHO again and this time I want to make a go of it. The original (of today), was very basic but there are a lot more refs now. I tried to fill it out and I think It would survive any deletion process now. If you want to add, you are very welcome. --Triwbe (talk) 20:33, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Destiny 105 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Destiny 105 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Destiny 105 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Davey 2010 Talk 20:54, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Destiny 105.1 FM Logo 2015.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Destiny 105.1 FM Logo 2015.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 29 November 2015 (UTC)