User talk:Jcoleman001

Can I talk to an admin

October 2016
Hello, I'm Justin15w. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Hampton, Virginia have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Justin15w (talk) 17:35, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Ok thanks Justin you did the right thing

Hi Jcoleman001 (talk) 18:32, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Hey favonian I don't know if you can see this but if you can I need to talk with you. Why does my page says sock puppet but I never had an account if your referring to the IP address the it is Hampton city schools which is shared wifi it's an school account. I'm not viBODY. And why am I blocked and the evidence is nothing but my page being edited by me. And why did you delete my page Jcoleman001 (talk) 18:59, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Favonian you can email me at jaekwoncoleman5@gmail.com Jcoleman001 (talk) 19:00, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Favonian
Can I talk Jcoleman001 (talk) 19:24, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Jcoleman001 (talk) 19:34, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Wow Jcoleman001 (talk) 20:50, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Yes it is google me and the other one one name is jkwon Coleman my name is jaekwon Coleman Jcoleman001 (talk) 20:51, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Favonian
Oh yeah and I'm not an sock puppet either Jcoleman001 (talk) 19:42, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Why Jcoleman001 (talk) 22:14, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Favonian
It also states that Blocks should not be punitive See also: Wikipedia:Sanctions against editors are not punishment Policy shortcuts: WP:BLOCKNOTPUNITIVE WP:NOPUNISH Blocks should not be used:

in retaliation against users; to disparage other users; as punishment against users; or where there is no current conduct issue of concern. Blocks should be preventative Policy shortcuts: WP:BLOCKPREVENTATIVE WP:BLOCKDETERRENT Blocks should be used to:

prevent imminent or continuing damage and disruption to Wikipedia; deter the continuation of present, disruptive behavior; and encourage a more productive, congenial editing style within community norms. Deterrence is based upon the likelihood of repetition. For example, though it might have been justifiable to block an editor a short time ago, such a block may no longer be justifiable right now, particularly if the actions have since ceased or the conduct issues have been resolved. Jcoleman001 (talk) 21:39, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Okay I understand. I respect that favonian that you are doing your job. I'll let you do your job. Have a great day 🙂. Jcoleman001 (talk) 02:09, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi
Jcoleman001 19:33, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Delete
I don't want my account anymore I'm done so I'm deleting my account. Jcoleman001 19:35, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Accounts can't be deleted, but that's no problem: if you don't wish to use your account then just abandon it. Probably quite soon everyone will have forgotten it. Also, user talk pages are not deleted except under quite special and exceptional circumstances. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:46, 19 October 2016 (UTC)


 * You still have access to this talk page while blocked in order to allow you to make unblock requests, not in order for you to play around. If you continue to misuse talk page access it will be withdrawn. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 22:19, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * You chose not to follow JamesBWatson's advise, so you talk page access has been revoked. Favonian (talk) 18:03, 24 October 2016 (UTC)