User talk:Jcrowenblog

July 2023
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to California Public Records Act, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. &maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   02:01, 5 July 2023 (UTC)


 * See https://sanjosespotlight.com/jain-california-public-records-act-weaponized-to-harass-elected-officials/
 * https://californialocal.com/localnews/statewide/ca/article/show/16150-49ers-santa-clara-city-council-cover-up/ Jcrowenblog (talk) 02:18, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Negative campaigning, you may be blocked from editing. &maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   02:01, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Additinally, please read WP:CITE before adding any more material to Wikipedia. Vague references to news stories don't cut it. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:20, 10 July 2023 (UTC)