User talk:Jd07920/sandbox

Article Evaluations
Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Everything in the article was relevant to the article topic because the topic was a general topic and not in depth. Nothing distracted me from the article.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? The article is neutral, it focused on generalized claims and ideas. It was not biased because it didn't show any prejudice against any other position when it discussed certain topics about ageing.

Check a few citations (hint: focus on the section about Sociology). Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? Where do the citations come from? The citations are correct. The links do work, and the sources support the claims in the article. The citations come from textbooks and journal articles.

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?