User talk:Jdelo012/sandbox

Consider the following structure, drawing from your notes:

First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? -The formatting was good, but maybe reformat the Waterloo checklist to indent the items or underline the heading in some way (maybe both?).This way you can leave out the "These signs are:" part because the format would imply it. -Maybe elaborate on what "ganging up on" means for those unfamiliar with the term in the School section. -Most important change in my opinion is getting more sources to provide for each of your sections in order to avoid bias.

Overall, clear and concisely written and I did not have much else to say.

-Mike