User talk:Jdemenczuk

March 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Court of Final Appeal (Hong Kong), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Court of Final Appeal (Hong Kong) was changed by Jdemenczuk (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-03-29T03:58:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:59, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Political freedom. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. RA0808 (talk) 04:08, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tina Demenczuk


The article Tina Demenczuk has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced BLP and no indication that she fully meets notability guidelines

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Polargeo (talk) 16:47, 29 March 2010 (UTC)