User talk:Jdementor/sandbox

The article does really well in using neutral content. There are vast amounts of neutral content. It is obvious the writer did a lot of research. The amount of links to different vocab words is helpful but I also feel there may be a little too many of them, it is a little distracting from the reading of the article. While the intro is short and easy to read I would add a little more to the Introduction it is a little sparse for me. There is a clear structure but I would like to see more as the article continues to grow. There is a lot of content in Description and symbolism but would like to see more in the other sections. In the Description part I would be careful about using the words "good," and "admired" as these are subjective words and you want the article to be neutral. In the Symbolism section, there is a good use of descriptions on symbolism, but I feel that some of this information could be transported to the description section. I feel like the lead could use a little more description of what is said in the body of the article. The intro has a link to the source used but the description does not have a link to the source. I feel there could be more sources used, it appears to me there is only one source used so far, so you could use more as the article expands.