User talk:Jdenney2001

December 2015
Hello, I'm GeneralizationsAreBad. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Barwinners without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GABHello! 23:23, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Barwinners, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. GABHello! 22:49, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Help me!
Please help me with...removing the article for Barwinners. A former student is using this page to harass the owner of the company by misstating the facts about a recent lawsuit that was settled.

Jdenney2001 (talk) 22:50, 11 December 2015 (UTC)


 * I see nothing in the material you have removed that is not supported in the cited sources. Your edit summaries claiming that the information is "misleading". "confidential", and "false" do not seem accurate. I suggest that you raise your concerns on the article's talk page, as has been suggested by User:GeneralizationsAreBad. Meters (talk) 23:12, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Article in question is Barwinners Meters (talk) 23:13, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I have no connection with this company, and I did not add the information. GABHello! 23:14, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Having seen this help me request, I have checked the entry. The section was problematic in a few ways, and yes, there was some "misstatements of facts" – though I don't know that it was part of any former student's vendetta or intentional at all. Regardless I have rewritten the section. This was a settlement, explicitly without admission of guilt, but the section stated it as a "finding" and failed to use language such as that it was "accused", it was "alleged that" etc. There was some minor close paraphrasing, and some (minor) failed verification. But I don't believe any of that remains now, and Wikipedia does report on negative information if of due weight and where verified through reliable sources. Absolutely agree with those above that any remaining concerns should be taken to the talk page, i.e., at Talk:Barwinners. Please understand that just because you want it to come out (I suspect because you are involved with the company) is no valid basis. You would need to cite policy and guideline supporting its removal.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:50, 11 December 2015 (UTC)