User talk:Jdforrester/Archive 3

Wikipedia Weekly site down?
Hi James, any idea what's up with http://www.wikipediaweekly.org ? -Pete (talk) 17:29, 13 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Yeah, server failure (hardware RAID controller fried; trying to extract the data). :-(
 * James F. (talk) 13:47, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you. But honestly, it's been the people attending them that have made them what they are. I've just been saying "let's all go to the pub", essentially. :-)
 * James F. (talk) 13:46, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia Weekly files uploaded
Hi James,

The Wikipedia Weekly files you gave me at Wikimania? They're on archive.org at last! And I posted on Wikipedia talk:WikipediaWeekly about it. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:59, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Cambridge meetup 3 December
I.e. Meetup/Cambridge/13. If you are able to be there, I'd like to pick up on the business I mailed you about, having now talked to Jon Davies of WMUK about it. If not, I'll write again. Charles Matthews (talk) 14:42, 27 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Sadly I'll be out of the country - but will e-mail regarding that matter.
 * James F. (talk) 18:16, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
&mdash;innotata 17:40, 29 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks.
 * James F. (talk) 19:32, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Peer review for Pope John Paul II
Hi James, I was wondering whether you'd be interested in this? Kind Regards -- Marek Kosniowski 02:58, 23 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks!
 * James F. (talk) 22:27, 22 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you -- Marek  .  69   talk  02:58, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

The Dukes of Beaufort
... would like it to be known that they enjoyed the attention and send good wishes to all their subjects both in and outside Monmouth. Thank you Victuallers (talk) 09:21, 24 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Ha. :-)
 * James F. (talk) 10:24, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

PD in NI?
No one seems willing to delete file:Hugo Swire Official.jpg and File:Owen Paterson Official.jpg. Please delete or unspeedy as you see fit. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:41, 1 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks - they're both unambiguously free under the OGL, actually. Have noted it there.
 * James F. (talk) 13:27, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Crown Copyright / OGL
Could you clarify your comments on Possibly unfree files/2012 February 2 regarding Crown Copyright? I'm not sure how you read a release under the OGL in that document. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:58, 6 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Hey! It's quite simple: I'm not relying purely on their poorly-written T&C page; I'm using the fact that this was my job. :-) I hope to extract an OTRS permission ticket soon from my colleagues. Will add to the discussion to clarify.
 * BTW, I'm a bit concerned about your edits to Open Data in the United Kingdom - particularly this, which isn't true (except for a few public bodies which have letters of delegated authority, UK Crown authorities do not have the authority to "opt to publish" under OGL. It was made for them by The National Archives. Also, this mis-understands that Crown Copyright is a statement of regime, not licence; your removal was incorrect. Will take it up there.
 * James F. (talk) 21:38, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

AfD for Chronology_of_diplomatic_recognitions_and_relations_of_South_Sudan
You participated in a related discussion before. The current one is here. Japinderum (talk) 11:49, 9 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Have put some thoughts there.
 * James F. (talk) 21:39, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * You're welcome! This RFC is related to that AfD as well. Japinderum (talk) 08:26, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

MSU Interview
Dear Jdforrester,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community HERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:
 * Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
 * Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
 * All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
 * All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
 * The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name HERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) 07:19, 12 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Sorry I'm so late to this; happy to help out if it's still running. Have put my details in there.
 * James F. (talk) 20:17, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks! :-)
 * James F. (talk) 20:11, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

MSU Wikipedia adminship process interview
Hello, my name is Kyle Zunker. I am a student at Michigan State University, working on an exploration of the Wikipedia adminship process. Thank you for agreeing to be interviewed. I am contacting you in order to set up a date and time for the interview. Please contact me at zunkerky@msu.edu with the dates and times that work best for you. If you have any questions or concerns feel free to contact myself or Dr. Jonathan Obar, the principal investigator of the project. I look forward to hearing from you! Zunkk (talk) 22:38, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Happy Birthday (2012)
'''Wishing Jdforrester a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 00:02, 31 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks, belatedly. :-)
 * James F. (talk) 10:05, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

ConfirmAccount extension
Hey :). You're being contacted because you are involved in the ACC process, or participated in the original discussion in '08 about the ConfirmAccount extension. This is a note to let you know that we are seeking opinions on switching this extension on, effectively making the ACC process via the Toolserver redundant. You can read all the details here; I would be very grateful if people would indicate how they feel about the idea :). Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 13:21, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

You're invited to Wiki-Gangs of New York @ NYPL on April 21!

 * Would love to be there - but sadly I'm in the UK this weekend. :-)
 * James F. (talk) 12:21, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 23
Hi. When you recently edited Principal Private Secretary to the Prime Minister, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Special adviser (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 23 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Whoops. Fixed.
 * James F. (talk) 22:11, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Career move
Gosh - can UKgov really get along without you? And will this reduce your attendance at Cambridge meetups? Charles Matthews (talk) 07:07, 18 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Yes, and I fear so. :-)
 * On the other hand, my attendance at San Francisco meetups will improve markedly.
 * James F. (talk) 08:51, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

May I extend my congratulations to your appointment, it is well deserved. That said, the London meetups won't be the same without you. CT Cooper · &#32;talk 13:10, 18 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I guess I'll have to designate the new "Convenor of the London Wikimeets"? ;-)
 * See you next month, I hope!.
 * James F. (talk) 13:34, 18 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I look forward to it. CT Cooper · &#32;talk 14:29, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Meetup/Cambridge/15
Any chance you could confirm one way or the other or are you in the US now?©Geni 15:29, 19 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the reminder - I'm not in the US, but sadly I've got a conflicting appointment. :-(
 * James F. (talk) 17:10, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Pain in the arse Scotswoman
Please see File:Port Logan fish pond - interior - geograph.org.uk - 88203.jpg and this. Unless you know some twist of Scottish law, I fear it will have to be deleted. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:54, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Saturday!

 * Yay. Looking forward to it.
 * James F. (talk) 01:17, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for participating this weekend!

 * Always a pleasure to help new people and catch-up with more experienced ones - thank you for organising it!
 * James F. (talk) 21:47, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Always a pleasure to help.
 * James F. (talk) 16:26, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

OTRS
Here it is. I could either transfer it to you, or transfer it to the correct queue...not both, so I just assigned it to you. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  18:18, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Danny O'Rourke (NPSL footballer)
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Danny O'Rourke (NPSL footballer). The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:17, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Danny O'Rourke (NPSL footballer)


The article Danny O'Rourke (NPSL footballer) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 03:32, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Authority Control integration
Hi James - hope SF is more pleasant than London is today...

Thanks very much for your comments on the authority control proposal on the Village Pump. We've refined it and worked out some more details after the discussion, and there is now a community Request for Comment to approve it being implemented. Any comments gratefully received! Andrew Gray (talk) 09:54, 29 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks!
 * James F. (talk) 18:14, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

OGL images
Hi James,

I've been wanting to let you know about the image deletion discussions regarding the Open Government License, to see if you could help.

First, there are some images largely or entirely uploaded by (suspected) socks of. One of these users, Slytherining Around32, got the images through freedom of information requests posted on the site whatdotheyknow.com (and claimed all crown copyright works are under the OGL). There also might be some images which were speedily deleted or prodded, uploaded by the listed socks of Marquis de la Eirron.
 * commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Eric Pickles Official.jpg, a current nomination on Commons
 * Possibly_unfree_files/2011_February_1 (Wales Office) [the Cabinet Office image of Maude I uploaded later on Commons without knowing of the discussion]
 * Possibly_unfree_files/2012_June_25
 * Possibly_unfree_files/2012_April_18
 * Possibly_unfree_files/2012_February_2 (which you commented on—the images were nonetheless deleted)

As far as I can tell, most of these don't have a clear statement of permission but would appear clear under the Controller of HMSO's offer. I'd like to know if you think there could be any issues, and if you'd like to go through some of these and get them undeleted yourself—there are a lot of images.

Also, if you know better whether MOD photos fall under the OGL, there are my nominations:
 * Possibly_unfree_files/2011_December_22, deleted
 * commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:General Sir Peter Wall - official MOD portrait.jpg, still open
 * commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Royal Air Force Recruitment Poster 1.jpg, deleted

&mdash;innotata 21:18, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Forgot to mention: I just found out about the Open Parliament License—some commons users are questioning whether the OPL and OGL are free licenses commons:Commons:Village_pump. &mdash;innotata 16:00, 19 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Have replied to the Commons thread on OPL; will follow-up on individual deletions; MOD items except for cases of a few of their agencies (Met Office, Hydrographic Office, etc.) are core Crown Copyright and so OGL. On the point of FOI releases, the claim that all items labelled "Crown Copyright" are under the Open Government Licence is incorrect, though all items that are core Crown Copyright are automatically OGL. James F. (talk) 20:38, 19 July 2012 (UTC)


 * On the MoD, still, that doesn't match the National Archives website saying the MoD still has a delegation of authority or the MoD's copyright webpage. Also, what's "core Crown Copyright"? The only definition I've seen is on the MoD website (outdated, then?) and photographs don't seem quite important enough to fall into it ("essential to the business of government" etc). &mdash;innotata 15:51, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * It turns out photos aren't covered under the OPL, but it would still be good if you could have a say on the differences between the OGL and OPL on the village pump.
 * Meanwhile, there are two new deletion nominations (commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hugo Swire.jpg and commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Owen Paterson.jpg) and undeletion request (commons:Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests). &mdash;innotata 19:50, 23 July 2012 (UTC)


 * The TNA's site says MoD has a delegation but I believe this only applies to a very small part of the Ministry's operations, primarily a few of their agencies that act under Trading Fund status.
 * The definition of "core Crown Copyright" is items under Crown Copyright per CDPA 1988 section 163 under the RPSI Regs 2005. Effectively, for these works the introduction of OGL over-rode the legislation with a more permissive executive decision.
 * Who has claimed that OPL doesn't cover photographs and other works? I'm quite sure that either (a) they're wrong, or (b) OPL will get ammended to fix that. It's certainly intended to cover all works, not just textual ones.
 * James F. (talk) 20:00, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply. The delegation of authority for the MoD's Directorate of Intellectual Property Rights is said to apply to "Military insignia, medals, photographs, technical material, illustrations and graphic works, film and video clips, musical recordings", on the National Archives site. (I didn't remember it was specifically for this body, but military insignia and medals are covered here, so I suppose all listed media are then?)
 * I'll look at the "core" definition, but it might still be good if you could clarify at commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:General Sir Peter Wall - official MOD portrait.jpg.
 * Currently Parliament.uk says so. "The Open Parliament Licence does not cover: the Crowned Portcullis, images featured on Art in Parliament, Parliamentary Archives, parliamentary photographic images, live and archive video or audio broadcasts". &mdash;innotata 20:13, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The nominations are now two more undeletion requests (commons:Commons:Undeletion requests) and there are two more deletion nominations (commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nick Gibb 2.jpg and commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vince Cable.jpg). This is getting rather tiresome. &mdash;innotata 16:12, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

As for the definition of core Crown copyright, the links you provided don't help me, with the limited background I have. What you seem to say is that all Crown copyright works (but not works owned by the Crown) are 'core'. The term "core Crown copyright" doesn't seem to appear on the licensing framework site of the National Archives.

I've not said it to clearly, but a few users at Commons are not grasping the offer of the Controller of HMSO, and the images that do appear to be clear are being deleted despite my arguing (and even the photo of Eric Pickles, which you commented on). They want clear statements of permission attached to the images at their source. It'd be good if you could help (and I'm not getting MoD images undeleted myself unless it's clearer).

More generally, I think people who would reuse Crown works (or something similar) won't be aware of the OGL (or such) with the level of documentation there is online, each department still claiming to set terms of use on websites. Maybe you should pass this observation on. &mdash;innotata 22:41, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Deletion apparently failed?
Hi! I finally got the chance to log onto Wikipedia, and checked my user talk page. I see that in its history log two entries were struck out, but the contents are still on my user talk page, as if they never got deleted in the first place. I assume you were the one who struck out the entries (based on history log I am looking at). Thanks in advance for any actual fix. --TheBlueWizard (talk) 20:07, 21 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Hello! I removed the reference to your name per the request, but not the redacted edits, per standard protocol. As a note, it makes much more sense to discuss this via e-mail, as otherwise you're likely to out further information you want surpressed; feel free to use the form. James F. (talk) 19:51, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Wikimania
Hey James just a quick note to say it was a real pleasure to meet you down in D.C. David Shankbone  00:55, 22 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks; it was also good to meet you in person. :-) James F. (talk) 15:41, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

/c replies
To:Jdforester From:Chan Myay Linn Subject:My User Page

Why do you-want me to Change my user page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chan Myay Linn (talk • contribs) 10:55, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Hi do You like this Kitty

Chan Myay Linn (talk) 10:58, 6 August 2012 (UTC) 

A brownie for you!

 * Replied on their talk page. James F. (talk) 19:46, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Enhance FAO presence in Wikipedia
Hello Jdforrester, I would kindly need your help or advice. I have contacted some veteran Wikipedian editors (Epipelagic and Gadfium) that have told me to contact you. I have seen in the UN Portal that you were one of the ones who contributed to build it. I've been given the mandate to see if it would be possible to build a Portal for FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) to enhance its presence in Wikipedia. Would you have some advice on how to proceed? I have read all the instructions, but having someone who has already contribute to do something similar it will help a lot. Or if you may have some name to whom I should contact, that would be great too. Thanks for any advice you may give. (MontseBL (talk) 14:16, 10 August 2012 (UTC))

You're invited! - Wiki Loves Monuments - San Francisco Events
Hi! As part of Wiki Loves Monuments, we're organizing two photo events in the San Francisco Bay Area and one in Yosemite National Park. We hope you can come out and participate! Feel free to contact User:Almonroth with questions or concerns.

There are three events planned:


 * September 15, Saturday - A bike ride along San Francisco's waterfront
 * September 22-23rd, Saturday-Sunday - Wiki Takes Yosemite
 * September 29, Saturday - A sunset and harvest moon bridges, palace, boats and tower tour

We look forward to seeing you there!

You are receiving this message because you signed up on the SF Bay Area event listing, or have attended an event in the Bay Area. To remove yourself, please go here. EdwardsBot (talk) 00:43, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Notre Dame de Dinant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romanesque (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Permission for OGL works
Can you please clarify that the offer of the Controller of HMSO releases all crown-owned works that don't fall under exemptions under the OGL as you've state before, at ? This is one of several deletion requests (including, of a file you uploaded; I can mention your message on the others) where has said:

"HMSO say the OGL applies to 'information where the relevant rights owner, or Information Provider which has authority to license the Information for use, make it expressly available for use under the terms of the OGL'. So unless you have evidence this image has been expressly made available under the OGL, it isn't OGL according to HMSO."

&mdash;innotata 17:48, 3 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Hey! I've been goaded by this into finally creating UK Open Government Licence, which (though a draft now) might help these requests over time. James F. (talk) 19:31, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Again, One Night In Hackney says you're "wrong":. Can you respond here? &mdash;innotata 22:43, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The images were not undeleted. I suppose we don't have completely clear evidence of permission, looks like you need to get this to satisfy Commons admins. &mdash;innotata 22:13, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

You've got mail
Best wishes, DBaK (talk) 17:49, 14 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Hello there. Not intending to nag at all, but nothing received. I know that you are very busy. Shall I talk to some other qualified person? No worries either way. Cheers DBaK (talk) 12:00, 3 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Replied. Sorry, didn't see any of this until now. :-( James F. (talk) 15:00, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

You're invited! Ada Lovelace Day San Francisco

 * Thanks, but didn't have time to go, sadly. James F. (talk) 15:29, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Arbcom
Hi. Any chance you might be considering it again? : ) - jc37 17:45, 19 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Ha. Not likely. I was over-joyed to leave, and I feel that my talents are better spent in other places now. But thank you for the query. James F. (talk) 15:29, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Lol - Nod. While disappointed, I fully understand. And you're quite welcome : ) - jc37 23:54, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Arbitration request
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Arbitration/Requests and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
 * Arbitration/Requests;
 * Arbitration guide.

Thanks, --Rschen7754 04:03, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Arbitration request declined
A request for arbitration in which you were named as a party has been declined.

For the Arbitration Committee, Lord Roem (talk) 23:13, 3 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks, both. James F. (talk) 17:19, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

UK government logos
Hello, I noticed that you keep replacing UK government logos with screenshots taken from www.gov.uk. I am not aware of any rebranding process being undertaken by UK government offices. To the contrary: the documents that I checked confirm that the logos remain the same. Also, logos (even those taken from gov.uk) are not published under an open licence, a fact that is expressly stated on gov.uk. Would you be able to clarify? Thanks. kashmiri 14:33, 16 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Hello! I'm confused. What replacements? I don't believe I've made any.
 * If you're talking about my uploading of a couple of images from DFID (this one and that one), I've not replaced the old logos on-wiki, and they're not screenshots but the official logos as released.
 * In fact there is a government-wide rebranding to use these licences going on, but per the requirements of the Efficiency and Reform Group's moratoria on communications spending that isn't vital, this is only being done ad hoc when signs need to be replaced or form letters changed.
 * Finally, the comments on the gov.uk website about licences are to avoid them inadvertantly releasing the logos under a freer licence than they are required to, they're not a government-wide statement of policy intent. These two were deliberately released under the OGL. James F. (talk) 19:49, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Goes to the Movies in NYC this Saturday Dec 1
You are invited to Wikipedia Goes to the Movies in NYC, an editathon, Wikipedia meet-up and workshops focused on film and the performing arts that will be held on Saturday, December 1, 2012, at the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts (at Lincoln Center), as part of the Wikipedia Loves Libraries events being held across the USA.

All are welcome, sign up on the wiki and at meetup.com!--Pharos (talk) 07:20, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Edit-a-thon tomorrow (Saturday) in Oakland
Hi, I hope you will be joining us tomorrow afternoon at the Edit-a-thon at Tech Liminal, in Oakland. We'll be working on articles relating to women and democracy (and anything else that interests you). It's sponsored by the California League of Women Voters, Tech Liminal, and me.

If this is the first you are hearing of this event, my apologies for the last-minute notice! I announced it on the San Francisco email list and by a banner on your watchlist, but I neglected to look at the San Francisco invitation list until this evening. If you can't make it this time, I hope to see you at a similar event soon! -Pete (talk) 04:45, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * 2013 New Year Honours (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Stonewall, Brecon and Radnorshire, Eidos, St George's Park, Woodside High School, Simon Martin, Territorial Army and Berkeley Group

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 29 December 2012 (UTC)


 * All fixed; tsk. James F. (talk) 11:43, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Two barnstars for you!

 * Thank you! That's very kind.
 * On the section header, it's absolutely no problem - it was my fault for not putting the tag back on.
 * James F. (talk) 12:36, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Day Celebration and Mini-Conference in NYC Saturday Feb 23
You are invited to celebrate Wikipedia Day and the 12th anniversary (!) of the founding of the site at Wikipedia Day NYC on Saturday February 23, 2013 at New York University; sign up for Wikipedia Day NYC here, or at bit.ly/wikidaynyu. Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues!

We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience!--Pharos (talk) 02:22, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 New Year Honours, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Metro Centre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Site broken?
Hi. When I visit  currently, I get:

Error 404 Vhost unknown

Vhost unknown

Varnish cache server

It seems to be a bit broken. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:39, 11 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Ho hum, yes. Clearly I need to point that to my current box. Thanks for the heads-up. James F. (talk) 19:25, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback deployment
Hey Jdforrester; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:31, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

post-nominals
Good morning Jdforrester, this is in regards to your { post-nominals } template your using. It is a very good idea and looks great (much tidier) in the script however I have noticed it does not work with the Order of the Bath's post nominals e.g: which does contradine WP:POSTNOM. If you could change your template to accommodative that, it would be great. Cheers Nford24 (Want to have a chat?) 01:46, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia Meetup NYC this Sunday April 14
Hi Jdforrester! You're invited to our next meeting for Wikipedia Meetup NYC on Sunday April 14 -this weekend- at Symposium Greek Restaurant @ 544 W 113th St (in the back room), on the Upper West Side in the Columbia University area.

Please sign up, and add your ideas to the agenda for Sunday. Thanks!

Delivered on behalf of User:Pharos, 18:06, 10 April 2013 (UTC)