User talk:Jdlrobson/2012-2020

A belated welcome to Wikipedia. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:31, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Signatures
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:31, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
I've replied to your comment at MediaWiki talk:Wikimedia-copyright. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 10:25, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Lead Photo For Hospet0-785521897720173.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lead Photo For Hospet0-785521897720173.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:05, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Lead Photo For Hauz Khas0-1134900008328259.JPG missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Lead Photo For Hauz Khas0-1134900008328259.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:41, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello
Hi Jon, I apologise for my comment at MediaWiki talk:Common.css implying that you were not active here. Thing is, I visited your staff userpage, User:Jon (WMF), and did not find any mention of the fact that you have a personal account, under which you do have a repertoire of encyclopedic contributions.

Additionally, your staff talk page, User talk:Jon (WMF), redirects to the user page, which is confusing and makes it very difficult for users to contact you. Can I suggest you either redirect your staff talk page to this page, or remove the redirect and keep a separate talk page for this account (as User:Philippe and User:Ironholds do, for instance)? Thanks, — This, that and the other (talk) 07:38, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

No worries and that's a great idea. I'll do that today! Jdlrobson (talk) 15:59, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Mobile question
How do you keep a bot from deleting a section on your talk page? I use mobile with beta turned on.Justaguy120 (talk) 16:06, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

This isn't really a mobile problem. Any page can be edited by anyone regardless of whether they are a bot or not. The best thing to do is talk to the owner of the bot and tell them constructively why you dislike what it does. Most bots mean well but they don't always come across that way. Jdlrobson (talk) 16:57, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

It hasn't happened to me yet. I just saw some bots archiving old conversations on other's pages. I wanted to know how to tell it which ones you want to keep, and which ones you want archived.Justaguy120 (talk) 02:45, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Your edit to Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 115
Hi, re : it's an archive page, so the discussion is closed. If you want to comment, please start a new thread at the parent page, including a link to that archived discussion. -- Red rose64 (talk) 08:06, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Gather edit feed
Yes indeed, I am interested. Will it work with beta mobile front end? --Thnidu (talk) 17:00, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Thnidu you can use it on desktop even! You just need to bookmark the page as we don't link from it anywhere :-) Jdlrobson (talk) 18:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The link goes to https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:GatherEditFeed?collection-id=3454, which is titled "Edits to pages in my collections" and comes up with the drop-down open to my Philadelphia watch collection. Is that what it's supposed to do? --Thnidu (talk) 20:56, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * • Also, the "Pages" tab should be labeled "Articles" instead. After all, the page is headed "Edits to pages in my collections", and the other tabs are "All", "Talk", and "Other". --Thnidu (talk) 21:08, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Pushipedia feedback
Please let me know what you think about Pushipedia here. Here's how you can help! Right now you'll need the latest version of Chrome (mobile or desktop) or Firefox (developer version). This makes use of pretty new technology that hasn't yet made it into other browsers.
 * Visit pushipedia and subscribe to "Trending edits (experimental)"
 * You should receive a push notification within a 48 hour period - number of notifications really depends on activity in the world and Wikipedia :)

Questions I'm keen to have answered by you:
 * What did you get push notifications about?
 * Did pushipedia lead you to make edits that you normally wouldn't have made?
 * Did pushipedia notify you of something happening before you heard about it elsewhere (e.g. news, Twitter, word of mouth)
 * Were there pages that you would have expected to receive notifications that you didn't?
 * Were there edits that you were alerted to that were due to vandalism? If so what titles were they (will help me finetune the algorithm).

Jdlrobson (talk) 22:58, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * It's quite fun. I've come across several new articles, e.g. Perry H. Carson (which I helped edit), an edit war in progress on Objections to evolution, and lots of sports and celeb pages. Not much breaking news, other than Planet Nine. One gripe - using Chrome on Android, the notification includes the whole article text, which scrolls through in my notification bar even after I dismiss the notification. Just the lead would do. Fences  &amp;  Windows  21:28, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for testing it! The whole article text should be fixed by now. Try visiting the script file and hard refreshing to make sure you are running the most recent version. I will take another look to be sure. Glad it's leading to some editing :-) With respect to the edit wars, I'm wondering if I should have a separate feed for edit wars as I'm muting a lot of them but it seems a useful thing to pull in soldiers :-). Jdlrobson (talk) 21:35, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Ta. It flagged vandalism on J. P. Manoux. A mix of trending topics and editing flashpoints is interesting, but separate feeds might be useful. A bot could edit WP:AN/I or WP:AN3 for cases that may involve vandalism or edit warring, and a list of trending topics might be useful in a community portal. Fences  &amp;  Windows  00:10, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Me again. It picked up Terry Wogan, who died today - the first I knew of it. I, uh, fixed a typo. Fences  &amp;  Windows  16:24, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Notification about disabling the Wikipedia collections tool
Thank you for using the collections feature in Wikipedia beta! Due to technical and moderation issues, we will be turning off this experimental feature. Your collections will be available for viewing and export until March 1st. If you would like to save your collection as links on a special Wikipedia page, please fill out the following form. If you are interested in giving your feedback about Wikipedia Collections please do so here.

Thanks,

Jon Katz

Product manager, Wikimedia Foundation

Jkatz (WMF) (talk) 23:54, 26 February 2016 (UTC) please get rid oif the latin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vox non clamantibus in deserto (talk • contribs) 00:59, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Using 100% width for an outer container box
[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=American_Revolutionary_War&oldid=789342875 this looks horrible]. I look forward to your corrections. Frietjes (talk) 20:24, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * since you don't seem to be around, I have reverted your changes and put a revised version with your changes in the sandbox. removing offending 'width:100%' from the outer container box, we now only have one fundamental problem as see case 2 in the testcases.  for some reason the title in the campaignbox is left aligned.  by the way, the alternative to passing the campaign box in using a parameter is to wrap both in stack, which I imagine isn't mobile friendly either. Frietjes (talk) 21:13, 6 July 2017 (UTC)


 * yes I am around. I'll look at your proposal. Could you please be a bit more descriptive about what the problem with my change was? "Looks horrible" doesn't help me so much :) Was it just the left alignment ? I suspect the article I was testing on was different to yours and I hadn't considered a different mode. Jdlrobson (talk)
 * using 'width:100%' for the outer container box means that nothing can float next to it, which is a bad idea for a right floating object. Frietjes (talk) 21:32, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Lorem ipsum
FYI: Lorem ipsum. - dcljr (talk) 11:55, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Sig
For the purposes of the archiving bot I've just added a dated sig to your comment at Template talk:Expand language. I believe the lack of a full sig will have prevented your pings from working. Regards, Cabayi (talk) 07:21, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Your map
...will appear in the next issue of the Signpost. I mean it to be flattering. I love this map. Best Regards, Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉  20:55, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Nice!! Thank you 🙏🙏 User:Barbara (WVS) :) Jdlrobson (talk) 22:30, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I am seriously considering having a poster printed out with this map on it-with proper attribution of course. Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉  22:42, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I just saw it in the signpost. Wonderful work.  Well done (thumbs up emoji). fish &amp;karate  09:09, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I agree, the map is awesome! ZettaComposer (talk) 18:39, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * It is wonderful! Thank you! Best wishes from Berlin/Germany! --Andrea014 (talk) 09:00, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * thanks all!! :) Jdlrobson (talk) 02:37, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
 * So far your map has made over 1,000 viewers laugh. Do you have any more artwork? Best Regards, Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉  09:56, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

List of pages not using stack template
in [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AJdlrobson%2FList_of_pages_not_using_stack_template&type=revision&diff=827313127&oldid=825677783 this edit] you added Princess Louise of Belgium instead of Princess Louise of Belgium (born 2004) which had the problem. same for Team Lotus instead of Team Lotus (2010–11); William Lockhart instead of William Lockhart (surgeon); and Central station instead of Central station (MTR). can you fix your query to include the parenthetical disambiguation? thank you. Frietjes (talk) 15:24, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Upcoming changes to wikitext parsing
Hello,

There will be some changes to the way wikitext is parsed during the next few weeks. It will affect all namespaces. You can see a list of pages that may display incorrectly at Special:LintErrors. Since most of the easy problems have already been solved at the English Wikipedia, I am specifically contacting tech-savvy editors such as yourself with this one-time message, in the hope that you will be able to investigate the remaining high-priority pages during the next month.

There are approximately 10,000 articles (and many more non-article pages) with high-priority errors. The most important ones are the articles with misnested tags and table problems. Some of these involve templates, such as infoboxes, or the way the template is used in the article. In some cases, the "error" is a minor, unimportant difference in the visual appearance. In other cases, the results are undesirable. You can see a before-and-after comparison of any article by adding ?action=parsermigration-edit to the end of a link, like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Foss?action=parsermigration-edit (which shows a difference in how infobox ship is parsed).

If you are interested in helping with this project, please see Linter. There are also some basic instructions (and links to even more information) at https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-ambassadors/2018-April/001836.html You can also leave a note at WT:Linter if you have questions.

Thank you for all the good things you do for the English Wikipedia. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 21:18, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Recommendations for mobile friendly articles
Hi! I ran across your edit to Geology, in which you cite Recommendations for mobile friendly articles. These recommendations, if implemented, would be a major change on enwiki. Improving the mobile experience is a laudable goal, but I think you might want to get some consensus for your guidelines first. — Gorthian (talk) 19:35, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for your recent work on the gallery template. That made a huge difference to the citole page.Jacqke (talk) 15:54, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Multiple image changes
As I understand it, you recently modified. At List of U.S. state foods, the last column for California is no longer displaying correctly. Is it possible that you left something unclosed in the current version? Thanks. BiologicalMe (talk) 16:48, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
 * This change seems to fix it although I'm not sure why. Seems unrelated to the recent template changes :/ Jdlrobson (talk) 20:21, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks. The entry was fine last week, and then it was broken. I looked to see if the template had been changed and it had. Post hoc ergo propter hoc sometimes works in troubleshooting and sometimes it leads in the completely wrong direction. Thanks for the fix, even if it was more black magic than detailed analysis of a defined system. BiologicalMe (talk) 04:30, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Problems persist, see for example Fusion power (I see a full-width grey rectangle just before the template). I think this has to do with the recent changes in TemplateStyles stylesheet (Template:Multiple image/styles.css). --Ita140188 (talk) 04:52, 15 August 2018 (UTC)


 * i'm still failing to see how and why this would cause a problem since all I did was add a style tag to the template (i didnt touch the structure) :(. All signs are pointing to a parser bug at the current time. If we can isolate this to a small example we can raise a bug against TemplateStyles and/or parser. 19:27, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I've opened phab:T202023 to get some guidance here. This feels like a bug, hopefully with a quick fix. Jdlrobson (talk) 19:39, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * see the main thread. better to have a centralized discussion. Frietjes (talk) 19:55, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Pequeno português
Hi Jdlrobson. I admit I have no clue as to what you did here, but thanks for your help. I really struggle with templates, each time I think I have got it, templates become deprecated. I appreciate it. Rui &#39;&#39;Gabriel&#39;&#39; Correia (talk) 18:48, 31 August 2018 (UTC)


 * they confuse me too. Don't worry! :) Jdlrobson (talk) 18:50, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Category:Templates that are not mobile friendly
Do you have in mind criteria for this category and how to populate it? ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:36, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

I've had a go at updating the description on the category page itself. Does that help? Jdlrobson (talk) 02:26, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks! ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:27, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Mobile editor jumping when the first new character is entered
I had this problem only last week, on this page Allegheny Airlines. I tried to update the text "Founded    1939 (as Allegheny Airlines)" in the Infobox.

I was trying to edit on a OnePlus One running Firefox 35.0.

I'm trying it again. On the mobile, I accessed the page, tapped the Pencil icon. After a delay, it says "X Editing Allegheny..." at the top, with the source text of the infobox immediately below.

Now here's a bizarre bug. When I scroll down, the page below a flightglobal.com ref appears to be all blank. I have no idea why.

I scrolled back up to the top and tapped the word "Allegheny" in the quoted Founded text, just after "All". The screen scrolled slightly and put a cursor in the word "airline" in the line that says:

| airline         = Allegheny

That's the bug I was reporting.

While I was typing this, the mobile screen went dark. When I brought it back, the cursor jumped back to where I had put it after "All" of "Founded   1939 (as Allegheny...".  The damn thing keeps going dark over and over as I document what's happening.  I'm going to start over.

Hit Pencil button. This time it's different. Source text comes up. I press the text after "All". The cursor goes there. I press the letter "f". It inserts the word "Member" ("AllMemberegheny Airlines").

It's just bizarro, unpredictable.

I used the Back button to get out, and tried again. The next time, it worked perfectly.

I am unwilling to use this editor when it gives me three different behaviors for the same set of inputs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gnuish (talk • contribs) 08:10, 27 January 2019 (UTC)


 * I've raised a bug and I'll see what we can do. next step will be for one of us to replicate it! Thanks for taking the time to report. Jdlrobson (talk) 03:32, 29 January 2019 (UTC)


 * "When I scroll down, the page below a flightglobal.com ref appears to be all blank.

I have no idea why." - I can help explain this one. Right now the edit icon at the top of the page allows you to edit the first section (lead section/section 0) not the entire article. This is obviously an inconsistency from desktop and confusing a lot of other people. This is going to be re-evaluated/potentially changed this year. Jdlrobson (talk) 03:37, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Test
test Jdlrobson (talk) 22:07, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Testing again
Test

Speedy deletion nomination of Tst page lah alh


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Tst page lah alh, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:58, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Main page 2020.01 technical update
So to move this live - will it need to be coordinated with phab changes or risk the existing specialcased mobile main page? I never did hear if you could point to where the current mobile main page layout configuration is actually stored. — xaosflux  Talk 04:23, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Should not require any config changes. If the config is enabled but the markup does not use ids prefixed with mp or mf then the special casing is ignored:) Jdlrobson (talk) 05:59, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Well, when I added a section that did start with mf-, it didn't show up there. I'm worried that all sections may disappear from mobile during the change. We currently have multiple mp- headers but they don't all show up there either, so that explanation doesn't make a lot of sense.  Do you know who would know how the enwiki config for this is actually being processed? —  xaosflux  Talk 13:10, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

I know the config and refactored the code a while back. There is one flag wgMFSpecialCaseMainPage.

What I am saying is provided there are no ids prefixed at all nothing in the page will be transformed (which is what's being proposed). A section with an id starting with mf- for example will not show if inside an element with class nomobile or navbox or if it lacks a title attribute (amongst possible other edge cases).

If you are concerned we can put the newly proposed main page on https://en.m.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org/ first which has the same config. Jdlrobson (talk) 14:12, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
 * either I don't know what I'm looking at or something isn't right. That beta page does not appear to be the same as our config now. Notably, this page doesn't have mp- or mf- divs at all.  Are you saying it would have the config that we would eventually change to, or that it has the actual config we have currently? Compare this production view to this beta view for example. What am I missing here? —  xaosflux  Talk 16:12, 1 February 2020 (UTC)


 * "Notably, this page doesn't have mp- or mf- divs at all." Correct. Yet despite having the exact same config as production all the content shows and nothing will hide. Since our new design doesnt have these ids either we are also good.

The content of both these main pages is obviously different but since this is a test wiki we could temporarily add the new main page design there inside Main_Page to confirm it will behave correctly. I have already done this on a local wiki.

To summarize: no config changes are needed to deploy the new main page. I have tested it.

When it's the default I will make the necessary config change to disallow any future invokations of the main page formatter so that this page behaves like any other page. Jdlrobson (talk) 00:17, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Wait what, are you saying the current production mobile front end design is not not show if there are mf's or mp's? We do currently have mp's on everything, and only a subset of them are on mobile - where is mobile pulling these in from? —  xaosflux  Talk 00:29, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

No I think I am adding to your confusion. Sorry about that. The new design Main page 2020.01 technical update does not use mf or mp prefixed ids. That's the goal here. If even one is present it triggers the code in mobile that strips anything that doesn't have them which is what we need to move away from. If you need to understand how that exactly works in more detail I suggest looking through the code that I linked earlier in the thread. Jdlrobson (talk) 01:16, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
 * OK that helps mostly, in that so long as there are not a single m*- id it will skip that processing. — xaosflux  Talk 01:24, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

MP update - possible issue
Please see Talk:Main_Page. — xaosflux  Talk 00:43, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Can you hop on IRC? — xaosflux  Talk 01:00, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry to miss you. I'll be on IRC for next hour if you want to talk. Jdlrobson (talk) 01:39, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Got a time that the rollback can occur - getting some more friction on Talk:Main Page. — xaosflux  Talk 12:42, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Are you online yet? . Need to know if any backend holdups are still in the way of fallback onwiki? —  xaosflux  Talk 19:02, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , you can go ahead. Jdlrobson (talk) 23:29, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅ thank you. We should make sure that User:Jdlrobson/Main page technical change roll out is fairly complete, and we will need to open a community RfC.  Getting some advocates to help on that page first is a good idea.  One of the largest "selling points" to our editors that care about the Main Page content is that this will empower them to do more with the mobile main page.  (Do we have pageview stats on the mobile domain?). —  xaosflux  Talk 23:49, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I'd rather avoid an RFC and make this a pure technical change targetting Minerva for now. At least this will allow us to focus on the single issue of revealing content on mobile. I'd hope that revealing that content would also help in working towards cultural change that mobile and screen resolution need to be considered as the same thing. I've made some updates to Main_page_2020.01_technical_update to restrict these changes to Timeless and Minerva and to be as minimal as possible. Jdlrobson (talk) 00:11, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Any clue if responsivemonobook will be impacted at all? I can't find documentation on that? — xaosflux  Talk 00:16, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , it won't be impacted. The responsive styles have now been limited to only apply on Minerva and Timeless: diff. I'm pretty sure this is a watertight - no visual change for any skin except Minerva which will still hide content on mobile devices (while we work out the displaying content problem - as I've said before this is not easily avoidable - but if it is a huge problem we can add a rule to MediaWiki:Minerva.css which only loads on desktop).
 * User:Jdlrobson/Main page technical change roll out no longer applies as there should be no changes other than Minerva desktop on mobile resolutions (usually a forgiving crowd).
 * Monobook in responsive mode seems to currently use the two column layout mode so it's not really responsive. The new version will continue to do so.
 * One small step for Wikipedians... Jdlrobson (talk) 00:29, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
 * No changes until Friday at least, no way we're going to do things to main page when WP:ITSTHURSDAY. — xaosflux  Talk 00:45, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
 * One small step for Wikipedians... Jdlrobson (talk) 00:29, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
 * No changes until Friday at least, no way we're going to do things to main page when WP:ITSTHURSDAY. — xaosflux  Talk 00:45, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
 * No changes until Friday at least, no way we're going to do things to main page when WP:ITSTHURSDAY. — xaosflux  Talk 00:45, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Lead Photo For Hauz Khas0-1134900008328259.JPG


The file File:Lead Photo For Hauz Khas0-1134900008328259.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "orphaned image, no encyclopedic use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jordan 1972 (talk) 18:55, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Toña (beer)


The article Toña (beer) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No evidence of notability, not seeing anything outside promotional materials and unreliable user (drinker...) reviews. No referenced content to merge."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:30, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Transclusions of deleted templates
Hi, I have been cleaning up WP:Database reports/Transclusions of deleted templates/1 and noticed that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere&target=Template:Id&hidelinks=1 Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Id] is pointing to three of your .js pages. clearly these are false positives (basically a bug in how WP parses .js pages). it would be really great if you could add to the top and  to the bottom of those pages. by putting these tags in comments, it won't prevent the javascript from executing, but it will remove those pages from [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere&target=Template:Id&hidelinks=1 Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Id]. thank you in advance for your help. Frietjes (talk) 19:51, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Deletion notice with multiple issues
Template:Deletion notice with multiple issues has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Raymie (t • c) 01:19, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Can you please help?
i don't what's happening on the zulu.wiki, the coat of arms (image_seal & image_shield) on articles keeps shifting to left on the mobile site like on this stub article here but on the desktop site it's on the center, where i think it should be...could the problem lie with the infobox template or something else? please help me out, when you get the time...have a good day. 3atbulletz (talk) 15:54, 31 July 2020 (UTC)


 * T259728 Jdlrobson (talk) 16:36, 5 August 2020 (UTC)