User talk:Jdoxpears

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 31)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jdoxpears/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=User:Jdoxpears/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Liance&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Jdoxpears/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Liancetalk 22:06, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
Hello Jdoxpears. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jdoxpears. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. ~Liancetalk 22:09, 31 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Good evening! Jade is my partner and I also manage her workflow and do more assistant related work for her, contracts, finance, negotiations etc.
 * I have not been paid to make this wiki page and have decided to make it solely because of the growth in the space she's in, I wanted to prevent as much fraudulent behaviour behind people using her online alias/name to scam people.
 * Having the wiki was just an idea I thought of having for a while now to counter the above and simply consolidate all of her links and sources into one repository as well as allowing for her fanbase to find out more about her as she grows.
 * We earn our living as a joint couple through her social media ventures. Again this wiki has not been paid for in anyway!
 * Please let me know if this clears things up or if I've misunderstood so I can rectify it ASAP.
 * Kind Regards. 2A00:23C6:880B:4E01:F08F:9A4:6B07:4B07 (talk) 22:09, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Good evening! Jade is my partner and I also manage her workflow and do more assistant related work for her, contracts, finance, negotiations etc.
 * I have not been paid to make this wiki page and have decided to make it solely because of the growth in the space she's in, I wanted to prevent as much fraudulent behaviour behind people using her online alias/name to scam people.
 * Having the wiki was just an idea I thought of having for a while now to counter the above and simply consolidate all of her links and sources into one repository as well as allowing for her fanbase to find out more about her as she grows.
 * We earn our living as a joint couple through her social media ventures. Again this wiki has not been paid for in anyway!
 * Please let me know if this clears things up or if I've misunderstood so I can rectify it ASAP.
 * Kind Regards. Jdoxpears (talk) 22:10, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
 * You need to read the actual guidelines and act accordingly to declare your conflict of interest. Whether you actually get paid or not is immaterial. I haven't looked at the page yet, but a repository for her fanbase--well, wee WP:NOTWEBHOST. Drmies (talk) 22:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Perhaps I chose the wrong wording there in terms of repository. But how about talk to me like a person rather than in a condescending manner, go over the page rather than say you've not even checked it and tell me where I've gone wrong. Jdoxpears (talk) 22:23, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Where you have gone wrong is your failure to disclose as a paid editor when you clearly have a financial interest in this subject, given your above statement that We earn our living as a joint couple through her social media ventures. So, let me speak to you like a person I want to be very clear to: If your next edit is not either making such a disclosure or asking for assistance doing so, I am going to block you from editing. And yes, that includes if your next edit is any more arguing here or anywhere, since that would not be making the disclosure or asking for help doing so. Instructions for disclosure are at WP:PAID. Seraphimblade Talk to me 00:19, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Jdoxpears/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Jdoxpears/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Drmies (talk) 22:14, 1 June 2024 (UTC)