User talk:Jdsmith33

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rebecca Sparling has been accepted
 Rebecca Sparling, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Rebecca_Sparling help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Chetsford (talk) 18:03, 20 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you! Great to hear. Jdsmith33 (talk) 00:03, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Links to user pages and sandboxes
Please do not introduce links in actual articles to user pages or sandboxes, as you did at Rebecca Sparling. Since these pages have not been accepted as articles, user pages, sandboxes and drafts are not suitable for linking in articles. and such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been deleted, please do not re-add any such links, thank you - Arjayay (talk) 20:12, 20 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks! This was completely accidental. I did not intend to link back to a user page or sandbox. I copy/pasted from a sandbox into this article draft so perhaps some links got messed up. I will re-link the appropriate citation for each place where it says "citation needed". If they are not acceptable, please explain it to me as I'm new to this :) Jdsmith33 (talk) 00:05, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I updated the citations. If it looks good now, can you please remove the box at the top that says:
 * "This article's use of external links may not follow Wikipedia's policies or guidelines. Please improve this article by removing excessive or inappropriate external links, and converting useful links where appropriate into footnote references." ?
 * I assume this message was due to linking to the user page...
 * Thanks! Jdsmith33 (talk) 05:51, 21 August 2023 (UTC)