User talk:JeanLatore/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Civility
Please read WP:CIVIL. Comments such as this are not treated lightly.  Corvus cornix talk  17:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Hello,. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.  Corvus cornix talk  17:48, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. I love you, too.  Corvus cornix talk  18:26, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Jeopardy!
I didn't unfortunately. Back when I was on it, only the winner got to keep their money, I came in second, and got a trip to Puerto Vallarta, Mexico out of it.  Corvus cornix talk  17:25, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Anal Sex with Sluts
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Anal Sex with Sluts, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Anal Sex with Sluts. Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 06:53, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

April 2008
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:55, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Aristoff
An article that you have been involved in editing, Aristoff, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Aristoff. Thank you.  Corvus cornix talk  23:48, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Please read WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS.  Corvus cornix talk  23:49, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Calin chi wong
An article that you have been involved in editing, Calin chi wong, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Calin chi wong. Thank you.  Corvus cornix talk  23:49, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

My previous incarnation
If I wanted you to know who I was before, I would have said.  Corvus cornix talk  00:07, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Mystik Media
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.  Corvus cornix talk  00:15, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Your personal attack edit comment at Mystik Media is not acceptable. You're going to get blocked if you don't knock it off.  Corvus cornix talk  00:17, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

WP:DTTR.  Corvus cornix talk  00:18, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

See Wikiquette_alerts.  Corvus cornix talk  00:35, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi. I just wanted to say that there are two really important things around here that we try to keep in mind: civility and assumption of good faith. We're always ready to welcome new contributors like yourself, but it would be great if you could keep those two things in mind. I know it can be hard sometimes, we all have bad days. Anyways, welcome, and please don't hesitate to ask me or any other administrator if you have a question or need some help. Cheers, Keilana | Parlez ici 05:58, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Premature FAC removed
I appreciate you're acting in good faith but it's best if featured articles are nominated by people who have worked closely on them. This way they can give reasoned replies to reviewers and be familiar with the sources to make any suggested improvements. Someone who hasn't worked on the article can't provide this input, so the FAC rumbles on until the opposes become so overwhelming that the article is failed, taking a lot of reviewers' time. The Beavis and Butt-head article is not FAC quality as is evidenced by the lukewarm reception, so I have removed it. I suggest you first work an article up through peer review and good article to prepare for WP:FAC. Sandy Georgia (Talk) 18:16, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Tort Law
I see you reordered the elements, so that actual cause follows proximate cause. Mind if I ask why? Non Curat Lex (talk) 03:54, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Could you please stop reverting edits to the List of basic tort law topics? It was nominated for AfD and kept because of improvement. Putting it back to the way it used to be is not the solution. Celarnor</b> <sup style="color:#7733ff;">Talk to me 06:26, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Zac Efron
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Kww (talk) 03:31, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * First, your source doesn't even mention Meyers. Second, even if it did, the best you could do was "some people think he is best known for resembling Mike Meyers", because it's a controversial statement that a lot of people would disagree with.Kww (talk) 12:04, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Non-free images
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without either fixing the problem that the tag refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template has been reverted.

Autism
Per your post at AN/I, any person may edit Wikipedia so long as they abide by our core policies. No policy precludes a person from participating on the basis of medical conditions of any sort. Edit away, so long as you abide by our policies. from the looks of your talk page, it seems others have linked you to most of our policies already. ThuranX (talk) 04:00, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


 * For mentorship, you could try checking at Adopt-a-User. Best, -- B figura (talk) 05:03, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I cannot offer you mentorship on a continuing basis, but if you'd ever like to ask if an article is sustainable please feel free to ask me on my user page or by emailDGG (talk) 19:01, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Phyllisha Anne
A tag has been placed on Phyllisha Anne requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. <font face="monospace" color="#004080"> LegoTech ·(t)·(c) 04:17, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

notability
I noticed your comment on my user page and removal of notability tags on articles without notability. I removed the comment from my user page and undone the removal of the notability tags. Please add notability to those articles and keep to the policy of no personal attacks and assume good faith. SunCreator (talk) 12:24, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * There is no automatic notability on legal terms as notability requires objective evidence, you can check in WP:N, but I do hope some can be found and added for Dies non juridicum. SunCreator (talk) 15:10, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Dies non juridicum
Please do not delete tags without discussing on the talk page first. If you think the page meets notability guidelines, does not need to be merged, or does not need sources (which is really non-negotiable, until the page has sources that tag should remain up), make your case on the talk page but please do not simply remove tags. That can be considered disruptive editing and can result in blocks from editing. WLU (talk) 22:04, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi,
 * Just to let you know, I have merged DNJ into the list of latin phrases and redirected there. WLU (talk) 13:10, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Mentoring
Hi. I saw your AN/I post when checking your contributions. I've been on this website for a while now (over a year and a half). I suspected from your Village Pump posts that you were autistic. I'd be happy to talk with you if you want my help with wikipedia, in dealing with this collaborative environment. I'll watch this page if you want to reply here, or you can use my talk page, or we can set up a new page in user space. Whatever works for you. Let me know if you want my help. Best, Darkspots (talk) 16:19, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Good. Anything you want to ask my opinion on?  Darkspots (talk) 01:53, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I guess the first question I would have for you is how you would like to communicate. We could take this off our user page to User:JeanLatore/Mentoring, and both watch the page and talk there. Darkspots (talk) 01:59, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * OK, we can pick this up later. One thing I wanted to throw out was talk page archiving. Check out Help:Archiving a talk page if you like--you could get some of the earlier posts on this page off your main talk page and into an archive.  There's no need to keep anything around that isn't useful--seven days (without further comment in the thread) is the basic guideline, but you can archive more or less often than that.  You only need to keep active discussions, like this one. The important thing to remember is that you have control over your talk page--the basic rules (WP:NPA, etc.) apply here as they do everywhere, but otherwise it's your space. Darkspots (talk) 02:13, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Spicoli centre
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Spicoli centre, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? nneonneo talk 22:52, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Mentoring Part II
Hi Jean. The reason I brought up archiving is that you can get stuff off your user talk page that's old or that does not make you look good. Which brings me to Anal Sex with Sluts. I saw that it was deleted as vandalism, I read the DRV, and it seems like all the editors who commented there were surprised that you had made this page. But it's still listed on your user page. Can we discuss this? Darkspots (talk) 20:14, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

civility for the record
I am glad you are gradually progressing in your Wikipedia career, and that you have moved on from insults like [|this]. An experienced editor removed that from my talkpage before I even saw it, which I was grateful for. I post this here not in hopes of obtaining an apology (though that would always be nice) but so other editors dropping by, who may also have received similar comments, can see the context and the pattern, and can give you credit for having mended your ways. BrainyBabe (talk) 07:21, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The edit in question was made on 2 April 2008. Darkspots (talk) 11:01, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I do think there has been some progression actually even though I've been on the end of . I have nothing against JeanLatore. Seems an individual somewhat confused by the whole wiki thing and having articles deleted, but then I guess that is not uncommon. SunCreator (talk) 11:15, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi JeanLatore
Responded at my talk page. Darkspots (talk) 00:24, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Sports Monster
Please stop removing the notability tag from Sports Monster. There is nothing that asserts notability within the article. <b style="color:#629632;">Celarnor</b> <sup style="color:#7733ff;">Talk to me 23:31, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Stub sorting
Hello ,

I noticed you marked an article as a stub using the <tt> </tt> template. Did you know that there are thousands of stub types that you can use to clarify what type of stub the article is? Properly categorizing stubs is important to the Wikipedia community because it helps various WikiProjects to identify articles that need expansion.

You can view the full list of stub types at WP:STUBS.

If you have questions about stub sorting, don't hesitate to ask! There is a wealth of stub information on the stub sorting WikiProject, and hundreds of stub sorters. Thanks! <font face="Bradley Hand ITC" size="3px" color="green">Jamie <font face="Bradley Hand ITC" size="2px" color="blue">S93  02:56, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Formatting
Could you please not copy articles directly from a word processor into Wikipedia? Or at least use OpenOffice, which doesn't generate the tab errors produced by Microsoft Word. While I can go through your articles and fix the other formatting errors that this practice produces with simple regexen and find-replaces, adding whitespace of varying lengths is a somewhat problematic thing to fix, and requires that I go through line by line and remove them. If you're going to continue doing this, at least use a different word processor (of course, it'd be better if you just wrote them directly into wikimarkup in the first place).

As an added note, your formatting doesn't seem to have improved any since you started; it looks like you're just copying your class notes on common law into Wikipedia from Word. While that doesn't bother me, as they look they can be worked into viable topic lists with extensive trimming, sourcing and other work, it would help a lot if you read and adhered to the Wikipedia manual of style as you wrote your contributions. <b style="color:#629632;">Celarnor</b> <sup style="color:#7733ff;">Talk to me 05:47, 30 April 2008 (UTC)`

Speedy deletion of Matthew's best night out
A tag has been placed on Matthew's best night out, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Fallenfromthesky (talk) 03:12, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of A night out to remember (story)
A tag has been placed on A night out to remember (story), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Fallenfromthesky (talk) 03:25, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Please stop reposting the same material
Please do not recreate the article you have been posting as "Matthew's best night out" and "A night out to remember (story)". This kind of story does not fit our requirements for encyclopedia articles, and it will be deleted again if you put it back. FreplySpang 03:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)


 * And you've earned a 72 hour block for continually reposting it, as well. Please stop it after the block, next time will be longer or indefinite. Seraphimblade Talk to me 03:32, 1 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Given that you have agreed to stop reposting the material, I will remove the block, since blocks are designed to prevent problems, not to punish. However, in the future, if you disagree with a deletion, please speak to the deleting admin rather than simply reposting the problematic material. Reposting deleted material is considered to be disruptive. Seraphimblade Talk to me 23:58, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Consensus
It's all about consensus, bro, everything I've been trying to say. Your blind spot is appropriateness; you have to compensate by being more sensitive to consensus than you think you'd need to be. Darkspots (talk) 03:42, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Audrey Elson
A tag has been placed on Audrey Elson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. <font color="#CC0000">seicer &#x007C; <font color="#669900">talk  &#x007C; <font color="#669900">contribs  05:40, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Flobots
What is your point. Unsourced information is unsourced information. Please add a source. Rau's Speak Page 19:31, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

He's right. No matter how familiar you are with the subject matter, you need to have reliable sources covering the subject. That is one of Wikipedia's core policies and isn't something that you can ignore whenever you feel like it. <b style="color:#629632;">Celarnor</b> <sup style="color:#7733ff;">Talk to me 20:38, 7 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The information that you are adding is unsourced, that will never make it past start. To make it to FA, which is unlikely simply because of the subject matter, you will need information on how the songs concept was brought into being, why they made the song, things like that. And they need to be sourced otherwise I will just remove them. Rau's Speak Page 01:53, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Considering I am directly quoting the song, I do not see how it is unverifiable. I intend to add a source, I simply need to locate the right template. Rau's Speak Page 18:16, 9 May 2008 (UTC)


 * It was a direct quote. And what about yours? That was entirely original research. Rau's Speak Page 21:14, 9 May 2008 (UTC)


 * ''see Talk. Rau's Speak Page 01:07, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Because you remember to sign every comment? Rau's Speak Page 01:41, 10 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I am being both calm and civil. And you seem to be avoiding the issue at this point. Rau's Speak Page 01:47, 10 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Okay. Do what you will. It's not like I am going to try and stop you. Rau's Speak Page 01:57, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I was wondering if you were actually going to do it. Now perhaps we can put my "uncivil" behavior in the publics eye. Rau's Speak Page 17:56, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Heads up
Dude, you've gotta decide where you want to go with this wikipedia thing. If you're having a good time with the way things are going, fine, but at a certain point your quarter runs out. If you want to keep going with this website, you need to seriously slow down and find another way to move through this little online world. Let me know if you want to discuss. Darkspots (talk) 01:55, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

FAC removal
Featured article candidates/Strap-on dildo has been removed from WP:FAC at the principle editor's request and because of snowball opposes, and has been archived. There is simply no chance that an uncited article will become featured. Dealing with spurious FAC nominations takes valuable time of many editors; please consider working an article up through peer review or good articles before nominating at FAC, and familiarize your self with the instructions at WP:FA, specifically:"Before nominating an article, nominators may wish to receive feedback by listing it at Peer review. ... Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article prior to nomination." and "Before nominating an article, ensure that it meets all of the FA criteria and that peer reviews are closed and archived." Sandy Georgia (Talk) 14:34, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Conversations with my good buddy Jean
I added a version of the meaning devoid of OR and I checked the billboard numbers, the Hot Digital Songs was outdated. Now, if you have the time to talk to me, please please please, contribute to the talk page so that we can sort this mess out. Rau's Speak Page 23:27, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Teen Magazine
A tag has been placed on Teen Magazine, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. LegoKontribsTalkM 03:14, 14 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I've removed the speedy deletion notice because the article clearly does not fit the criteria given. Seeing as you are the author, and you have proposed deletion, perhaps you should place a tag on it. Kevin (talk) 07:25, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Lo-Ji Sales against New York
Excellent work, Jean. You deserve an attaboy for starting the article, and doing a good job on formatting the graphic, as well as presenting essential information. If you want to continue to work with the article, you should insert footnotes or inline citations with the pinpoint citations for each proposition that you summarized from the facts and holding of the case. Keep up the good work. Non Curat Lex (talk) 06:04, 16 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Jean - I want to encourage you for starting serious and worthwhile articles - since many of the articles you've started have not survived. That does not mean that it is a FAC. You should follow the advice of the other editors. Non Curat Lex (talk) 20:35, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Small Sluts, Nice Butts
A tag has been placed on Small Sluts, Nice Butts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. J.d ela noy <sup style="color:red;">gabs <sub style="color:blue;">adds 03:04, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The speedy deletion is invalid because this article is not about a group, website, nor real person, so I removed the speedy deletion notice. However, I have nominated it for deletion because it does not explain its notability using the proposed deletion process. You have a week to fix this and then remove the notice for proposed deletion. Jesse Viviano (talk) 05:01, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Small Sluts, Nice Butts
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Small Sluts, Nice Butts, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Jesse Viviano (talk) 05:01, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Editor review
Jean, I think that a serious review is premature. It seems that you have a genuine interest in contributing to the project, but the slut stuff is just way off base and it still remains at your user page as a described priority. I've looked through your work and interactions with other and I think that you got off on the wrong foot, but are making a nice effort at growth. You've definately done some nice work on the legal issues, but you should study WP:N to get a better idea of how and why we demonstrate notability. Sometimes it is a good idea to walk away from WP for an hour or two if you get angry -- there are some real pricks here and they are experts at getting under your skin. Porn is probably important to the project in some ways, but try seeking the higher road of that topic. Good luck to you! --Kevin Murray (talk) 02:31, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Jean, you do have 500 edits which shows a strong committment to the project, but you've had a troubled start. I have politely refrained from going further into the matter as I believe that you are on the road to improvement.  Typically people seek a review in preparation for becoming an administrator; you are very far from being a candidate.  Please continue to contribute, but take my advice from above.  Cheers! --Kevin Murray (talk) 02:43, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

RFC
It doesn't really have a place for me to respond. Rau's Speak Page 18:58, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Edit warring on the handlebars song page
You continue to put the same material into the article over and over and over again. I notice you have intentionally tried to avoid WP:3RR by doing so slowly. That will not save you from being blocked. Repeatedly replacing challeneged material to an article over and over is disruptive, and it is edit warring. Furthermore, the burden of proof is on the person adding the material. That several editors have challeneged the material means it is your responsibility to find references before adding it back again. If you continue to replace this material, in whole or in part, without first meeting the referencing requirements, you may be blocked for edit warring and disruption. --Jayron32. talk . contribs 03:02, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Disturbed
If you do not want information removed, source it. You also seem to be engaging in personal attacks on other pages, please refrain from doing that. Rau's Speak Page 17:57, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Inappropriate removal of others' comments
Please don't do this again. Thanks - Raymond Arritt (talk) 18:00, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Raymond arritt, without clicking on the link, someone reading this might think that JeanLatore had deleted a talk-page comment. He deleted a resolved template that had a comment with it.  He did that, I think, against consensus, which is bad--but it is not just a "removal of others' comments".  If the resolved template had been placed against consensus, removing it would have been completely appropriate. JL, I would suggest placing nowiki tags around the template or some similar thing in the future, leave the comment made by the person who added the resolved template, and then add your own comment to explain why think the matter isn't resolved.  Darkspots (talk) 18:15, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, that would have been much better than removing the material outright. Raymond Arritt (talk) 18:19, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I do see your point. I just wanted this to be clear. Darkspots (talk) 18:28, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: fleaubots template
Hi, there! Yeah, I just did create the Template:Flobots template. I also made these templates releated to the Flobots (if you would like to put them on your page too):

Enjoy and I'll talk to you later. Alex (talk) 21:40, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

You're excused
Quit wasting others' time and it wouldn't be a problem. You're wrong about the First Amendment applying to Wikipedia. It doesn't now, it will not any time soon, and no matter how many times you attempt to revive the thread it will not change. your addition of unsourced and dubious material is likewise a waste of time, and I shouldn't even have to comment on adding things to someone else's userpage. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 00:18, 25 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The "First Admendment" is the fictional amendment which somehow makes your argument correct. In light of that, there is no real amendment which makes your argument correct, and Wikipedia isn't your soapbox. A wide array of editors have listened to you and told you why you're wrong. If you refuse to listen, that's fine, but it doesn't change the fact that you're wrong, and continuing to revive the thread in vain is only wasting others' time. There are better things to do than revive the thread or talk about how you'd like to plow Erin Esurance. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 00:24, 25 May 2008 (UTC)


 * You could do so if you wish. I don't really care. Rather than try to out me, I'd suggest looking into your own behavior first. Your last little string of edits show that you're not exactly editing to be helpful. Should be a fun exercise in futility. Then there's the edit warring on Handlebars, bringing up Rau's RFC on a completely irrelevant page. That, too, would be following. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. So if you want to file an RFC for me undoing your nonsense, you go right ahead. It won't go as well as Rau's RFC did, and he's still undoing the very things you're trying to add. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 00:35, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Just commenting that I find it amusing to think that he's harassing you. This is not sourced and is otherwise original research. As is this, this, and this. If you care to file an RfC (which does nothing really), you'll find that your stance really has no merit. This also makes me question your understanding of Wikipedia - talk pages are solely for discussing changes or improvements to the article (see WP:TALK); it isn't a forum where you can talk as you please. That and your First Amendment diatribe is frankly laughable. You're honestly quite stubborn if you're still pursuing the issue even though a dozen or so editors have pointed out why you are blatantly wrong. <font face="Verdana"> Sephiroth BCR ( Converse ) 01:58, 25 May 2008 (UTC)


 * No, it's you not listening to common sense. What do you plan to accomplish through that discussion in any case? Whether you're wrong or right, consensus is clearly against you. Anyways, that whole discussion could be treated as soapboxing, is not looked at kindly here. Let it go. <font face="Verdana"> Sephiroth BCR ( Converse ) 06:57, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Reply in English next time please. I don't feel like deciphering your posts. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 00:09, 26 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Funny, other people seem to believe otherwise. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 02:59, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

RE:Hello
I'm good, feeling kinda sick from the BK. I always intend to allow relationships with editors to over multiple matters, disagreeing on one thing should not deter that. How are you? Rau's Speak Page 23:23, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Hello, friend!
Hey there! I'm Angie! So you have autism too, huh? Angie Y. (talk) 15:13, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Concepts in contract common law
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Concepts in contract common law, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?  MBisanz  talk 04:38, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Slut
It's not necessary to copy the entire passage into the article. A simple quote and reference is enough. OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:47, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Here is your context. Please don't revert that again. OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:49, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Copyright violations
If you upload a copyrighted image again, you will be blocked. OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:54, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: Mentorship
Yea, sure. I'll help you out if you have any questions. Feel free to either leave a message on my talk page or click the "email user" button. Sasquatch t&#0124;c 21:22, 30 May 2008 (UTC)