User talk:JeanLucMargot/Archive 1

Added Π to Dwarf Planet
I added Π to the table and associated blurb on the dwarf planet page. Procrastination is my forte. I'm not sure about the "refined" clause: it might be presumptuous. Tbayboy (talk) 16:44, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Stern and Levison (2002) considered single encounters that produce deflection angles in excess of 1 radian during a Hubble time.  While that calculation may be interesting in terms of close encounter time scales, it is not at all equivalent to the IAU criterion of clearing an orbital zone. JeanLucMargot (talk) 19:33, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Reliability of bestcolleges.com
Can you please clarify this edit? In particular, can you please explain how that source meets our standards for reliability in sources e.g., what evidence exists that it has "a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy?" Thanks! ElKevbo (talk) 06:40, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Hubble's law
Please gain consensus for your changes on the talk page. The references are abundantly clear that the law is widely (mis)attributed to Hubble (that's why it's called Hubble's law), and while the IAU can make recommendations about what to call the law, it doesn't get to decide what the WP:COMMONNAME is. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 14:51, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Right. One cannot use these references to support the claim that the law is correctly attributed to Hubble.  These references can only support the claim that the law is incorrectly attributed to Hubble.  JeanLucMargot (talk) 15:03, 30 October 2018 (UTC)


 * No one said that it was correctly attributed to Hubble, just that it was attributed to Hubble. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:07, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * None of these references attribute the law to Hubble. They attribute it to Lemaitre.  So if you wish to make the claim that the law is attributed to Hubble, find references that support that claim.  If you wish to make the claim that the law is misattributed or incorrectly attributed to Hubble, then these references are appropriate. JeanLucMargot (talk) 15:13, 30 October 2018 (UTC)


 * From and "literally millions of other source"

Edwin Hubble is considered one of the titans of early 20th century observational cosmology. He is credited in most textbooks and the popular literature for a series of important discoveries made between 1920 and 1930:
 * The confirmation of the Island Universe hypothesis
 * The classification of extragalactic nebulae
 * The discovery of a linear relationship between distance and velocity for extra-galactic nebulae, providing the first evidence for the expanding universe
 * The brightness profile of galaxies

Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:17, 30 October 2018 (UTC)


 * How is this relevant to the requirement that references must support the claim? I don't have a problem with the claim that the law is widely attributed to Hubble.  I do have a problem with using references that don't support this claim to support this claim.  JeanLucMargot (talk) 15:24, 30 October 2018 (UTC)


 * It's literally written black on white. I'm done wasting time on this. Take it to the talk page if you insist on failing to read. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:27, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Hellow
Hi JeanLucMargot--Mr.Karmi (talk) 18:54, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi
Can you respond?--Mr.Karmi (talk) 12:05, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Palisades Park, (Santa Monica) Thanks, Thoughts, Questions
Good Morning Jean Luc Margot: Thank you for the contributions as wikipedia editor to the Palisades Park site, which included adding trees. And thanks for thanking me for making an edit to the trees sections of the wiki page about the Italian Stone Pine, Pinus pinea. I learned the feature of 'thanking' which I make a habit of doing now as well for other editors. And I just thanked you for your edits of about 3 years ago on Palisades Park. I hope you visit the Palisades Park to see additional edits I have made on the trees and the public art sculptures. You will notice that a few additional wikipedia editors have now been making edits and improving the site. I am glad to have added the historic Native American totem pole to the Palisades Park site. I hope you like and would look forward to your thoughts and questions regarding the Palisades Park site. I was sad to have to make lower case the English names of trees, starting with cypress, which you had listed in capitalization as Monterey Cypress, and which I like and prefer and think is correct, but Wikipedia unfortunately follows MOS, requiring animal and plant English names, even though proper nouns, to be lower case, so I changed the cypress to Monterey cypress, but at least 'Monterey" remains capitalized due to being the name of a place (city and county of California). By the way, I like astronomy, especialy archaeoastronomy, especially the satellites and planets in our Solar System, but also the stories of our constellations, especially Aldebaran, as Abbot Kinney named one of the Venice Canals as Aldebaran, which was filled in and asphalt used to make a street that is called Market Street.  I have begun an effort to do historic signage indicating that Market Street was the location of Aldebaran Canal with an eventual goal to convert the street back into Alderbaran Canal. Kinney named other Venice Canals linked to Astronomy, such as Venus Canal, which runs parallel to Aldebaran Canal. On and on, "across the universe" (thinking Beatles song). Be well. Hoping you are well, family and friends are well, given our era of the virus pandemic. Peace, 'Roy' (Robert Jan van de Hoek) "Earth-Planet, Universe" as John Muir would do in signing his letters at certain times.Robert Jan van de Hoek (talk) 13:30, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)