User talk:Jean Eti

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wilhering College (January 20)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wilhering College and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Wilhering_College Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Wilhering_College reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:56, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wilhering College has been accepted
 Wilhering College, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!  DGG ( talk ) 08:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Wilhering_College help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Canisiuskirche article
Hello, thanks for writing this! I've just been starting to add a few things to the article - tags on the talk page, categories, linking to the dewiki article and so on - and I wondered if there were any more sources you could add? I realise that this is a translation from dewiki, but much of the content is unsourced and I'm wondering if there are more sources out there or if it might be best to remove what text can't be sourced.

Let me know what you think. Blythwood (talk) 17:12, 13 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Hello, thank you very much for your help! Actually nearly all information in the text is sourced, but unfortunately by only three different sources. Therefore I have added the sources at the end of the paragraphs. At the end of my main source (also a wiki) several books are given as source, unfortunately I do not know them. Anyway, there is no critical information in the article, just a description of the church. I therefore think that the given sources are sufficient. --Jean Eti (talk) 07:15, 14 September 2016 (UTC)