User talk:Jean Girard

(Note: He was trolling, and he doesn't have anything better to do with his time.)

<<unblock|I am requesting again for several reasons. The first, I have recently been reading Wikipedia blocking policy, and after reviewing my vandalism of the page for Brian Vickers, I found that it seems that I should not have been blocked indefinitely. I get my reasoning from the blocking policy (I am not sure if what I did was only vandalism or a personal attack as well):"Vandalism — Blocks should not be used against isolated incidents of vandalism. Dynamic IPs: up to 24 hours. Range blocks: about 15 minutes, then 1-3 hours, and 24 at most, to avoid collateral damage. User accounts with persistent violations may be blocked indefinitely. Personal attacks — Blocks should not normally be used against general incivility or isolated incidents of personal attacks. Again, dynamic IPs: up to 24 hours. AOL IPs and range blocks: about 15 minutes, then 1-3 hours, and 24 at most, to avoid collateral damage. User accounts with persistent violations may be blocked indefinitely." I have not had a history of persistent violations, and it seems that the most I was supposed to be blocked for was 24 hours. I also read in the blocking policy that if the vandal basically promises not to vandalise pages again, then they can be unblocked. Obviously, I am doing that right now. I seem to be looking for loopholes, and I probably am, but I hope that my request can be honored at last after about 6 months. Now, desperately, I admit to the vandalism (though I suppose that doesn't need doing as you can clearly see I did it), and I honorably (you must be thinking, "Yeah, right...") vow to begin to help Wikipedia rather than degrading it. I doubt that you will believe me, and I'm sorry to make you read this seemingly miserably long request, but I really hope that I can return to editing the bad grammar that I sometimes see that annoys me so. Excuse any of my own grammar which may have been improper. Thank you.>>

Martinez & Caldwell
To User:Jean Girard and User:69.137.62.64:

Please do not create hoaxes. Cease and desist from introducing misinformation into Wikipedia if you are attempting to test our ability to detect and remove it. This has been done before, with universally negative results. Hoaxes are marked for deletion shortly after they are created. Kindly — do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia, and then to check to see how long they have been in place and, if possible, correct them. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia policy to learn more about this project and how you can make a positive impact. Thanks, --Calton | Talk 13:18, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Jean Girard for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. — Athaenara ✉  22:21, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

OhanaUnitedTalk page 22:40, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Jean Girard (2nd nomination) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. JavaTenor (talk) 01:28, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Jean Girard (multi) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. — &eta;oian   &Dagger;orever &eta;ew &Dagger;rontiers  07:51, 8 December 2008 (UTC)