User talk:Jean KemperNN

November 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Talk:Logical hexagon, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:10, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Jean KemperNN! I am Trafford09 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out Questions, or feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or type helpme at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. Again, welcome! Trafford09 (talk) 12:19, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

Misplaced edit
Hi. I've reverted this edit of yours, which I'm sure you posted to the wrong page. Please be a little more careful :)

Oh, one more thing, please be aware of: Trafford09 (talk) 12:34, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Edits related to your own research
Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Logical hexagon are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Talk pages are to discuss problems with or improvements for an article, not for discussing the subject of an article. Dougweller (talk) 17:46, 25 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Please also see the comments at Talk:De Interpretatione, and at User talk:84.100.243.155 (from June 2009). Wareh (talk) 14:48, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Continued flouting of wp:ES
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. As you have been asked before, when you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Aristotle. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page.

Wikipedia relies on wp:consensus, and our all adhering to its guidelines.

One such is wp:ES. Please adhere to it, or state why the consensus doesn't apply in your case.

- pie - global contribs

Trafford09 (talk) 15:25, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Epsilon0 (talk) 19:12, 5 January 2011 (UTC)