User talk:Jean courbet

January 2013
Hello, I'm Rocketrod1960. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Jack Warner (football executive) because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Rocketrod1960 (talk) 08:06, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jack Warner (football executive), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Thank you.--Jahalive (talk) 12:19, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Maybe some of the stuff you are adding could go in the Jeffrey Webb article.--Jahalive (talk) 12:26, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Jack Warner (football executive), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. --Jahalive (talk) 17:50, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Jack Warner (football executive), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Jahalive (talk) 07:21, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. It is evident that your purpose here is to use Wikipedia to publish a personal opinion, in violation of Wikipedia's policy that articles must be written from a neutral point of view. Your content has not provided any reliable sources for verification, and you have also repeatedly removed content which does have reliable sources, without any explanation. You have repeatedly made the same, or substantially the same, changes to an article instead of discussing with other editors why you think your changes are valid. Repeatedly making the same edits, known as edit warring, is considered disruptive. The only reason that I am not blocking you indefinitely is that I don't think the messages above made it clear enough what the problems with your editing were. Now that I have given you this explanation, any continuation of the same sort of thing may well lead to an indefinite block. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:27, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

February 2013
Your addition to Jack Warner (football executive) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:01, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Upon further review, you have resumed the same exact editing pattern that lead to your block last week. Therefore, I have blocked you indefinitely as it is apparent that you are continuing to be disruptive. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:04, 8 February 2013 (UTC)