User talk:Jeanklat

Speedy deletion nomination of Supply-chain finance Model
Hello Jeanklat,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Supply-chain finance Model for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article,.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 14:28, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello Sir,

'''I am sorry to say that nowhere in existing article you mentioned there is a workflow description of scf. People reading the article will be like reading a list of definitions without understanding the process. My text is a needed complement from a real-life view of a professional. Please do not delete my added text as it does not generate conflicts and in the contrary brings an added value to people interested to use scf.'''

I did not delete your article. I tagged it for deletion, because it seemed to be mostly about a topic already covered on wikipedia, and a moderator, who must have agreed with me, did the actual deletion. If your text is important for the understanding of Global supply-chain finance, why not add your information there, where the people who need to see it will see it? ubiquity (talk) 18:49, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

More on supply chain
Hi, Jeanklat. I believe you have me confused with someone else. I was the one who originally tagged the article for deletion, because I believed it duplicated Global supply-chain finance. A moderator named De728631 (Talk) did the actual deletion. You claimed you had additional information, and I suggested you add it to Global supply-chain finance. I see you attempted to do that, and once again De728631 took exception, citing "unreliable source, borderline soapboxing." I had nothing to do with this, but I believe I can tell you what he meant. The source for your information appears to be your own website. On Wikipedia, this is considered unreliable for many reasons, including potential for conflict of interest (really, you shouldn't be writing about your own company at all) and lack of credibility. This is exacerbated by the "borderline soapboxing," which is typical of material from a company source.

If you want your information in wikipedia, try to find an external source, independent of your company. If you can't find such a source, perhaps it is too soon. Please see the general notability guidelines for more information.

In any case, I don't have any particular interest in your article. If you want to discuss why De728631 deleted your last attempt, it is De728631 you should be talking to.

One more thing: when you add material to a User Talk page, please add it at the BOTTOM, as I am doing here. I moved your material on my talk page to the bottom, so if you want to continue this discussion, please continue it there, instead of adding new material at the top. Thanks. ubiquity (talk) 19:35, 26 January 2015 (UTC)