User talk:Jeanthefact

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via live help, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! undefined tausif  12:28, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

July 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Umar Arteh Ghalib, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 09:28, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Umar Arteh Ghalib. Thank you. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 09:30, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Sanctions against Iran
You have added material to material to two articles on sanctions against Iran which is not backed up by any citation of a reliable source and is poorly written. If you feel the content is correct, please find a reliable source to cite and draft more carefully. NPguy (talk) 18:11, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Navid khiabani
Hello Jeanthefact,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Navid khiabani for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. LS1979 (talk) 09:46, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Navid Khiabani
I mentioned your contributions at Talk:Navid_Khiabani Govindaharihari (talk) 13:08, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Navid Khiabani for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Navid Khiabani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Navid Khiabani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Govindaharihari (talk) 16:32, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Hello, I'm Weegeerunner. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Navid Khiabani without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Weegeerunner (talk) 23:00, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Navid Khiabani, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Weegeerunner (talk) 23:08, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Navid Khiabani with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury (talk) 23:20, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Navid Khiabani


Please do not make articles about a living person that are entirely negative in tone and unsourced. Wikipedia has a policy of verifiability and any negative information we use must be reliably sourced, and our articles must be balanced. Negative unreferenced biographies of living people are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GregJackP  Boomer!   21:46, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Jbh (talk) 00:52, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Your attack pages
This is to all involved:



Please do not post anything at any Wikipedia page about him. I do not think you are here to help build the encyclopedia. I think you are here to expose this person. You have delcared that you are a group of free reporters doing this. You have not provided good sources and you have not written neutrally. If you post anything about this person again, you may all be blocked from editing without further notice. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:08, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:16, 21 April 2015 (UTC)