User talk:Jebahi

September 2015
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Discrete element method. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Glrx (talk) 19:54, 15 September 2015 (UTC)


 * It is not a promotional material (that is of no interest to me). It is just to draw the readers attention to the fact that DEM can also be used to model continua (very recent topic and not yet well known). Please let specialized scientists edit scientific articles. Thank you. Jebahi (talk) 23:01, 15 September 2015 (UTC)


 * It appears to be your book, so there is a conflict of interest. I did not find any book reviews for it. You also put it as the first book in the list. It is not about FEM in general; it is not clear that a general WP article need address new developments in FEM. Glrx (talk) 23:45, 15 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Ok, thank you. When we talk about science and learning there is no conflict of interest. Just for your information, FEM et DEM are very different concepts. I believed that only specialized readers allow themselves to change articles. Jebahi (talk) 00:50, 16 September 2015 (UTC)


 * A typo. Glrx (talk) 22:59, 20 September 2015 (UTC)